revolution?

>would it be better if it was even further from what it should be?
Wew

partisan judges are a no no

Yeah, exactly.

>it could be worse
Isn't an argument

Well, it actually is worse, all over the world.

Anything you could think of could potentially be worse

>It could be the UK
is terrifying

If you want SCOTUS to strike down laws that do not violate the constitution or precedent, you're asking for them to be activists.

I thought justices were partisan as a matter of course.

They do violate the constitution

After all, you've got D-appointed judges, and R-appointed judges.

Nothing I can think of can be worse.

And the Patriot Act does not violate the constitution in the opinion of the 9 people appointed specifically to determine that.

You wouldn't appoint judges who wouldn't see things the way you do.

Circular argument

It's a shitty law. I want it gone. But SCOTUS waving a magic wand is NOT how I want it gone.

>scotus works because scotus says they've done this correctly

they arent technically R or D but can lean left or right

If they haven't done it correctly then they can be impeached.

Only takes 60 senators.

And they haven't been, hm

It's almost like consensus within the system is more important than the constitution

Remember the purpose of 2a?

I mean we SHOULD have teh Legislature do its FUCKING JOB

.....wow, so the earth is flat huh?

nah its a dodecahydron

shocking.

It's almost like the legislature is not doing what it's supposed to be doing and offloading all responsibility onto SCOTUS and the bureaucracy.

No, the world is a Torus. Maps are rectangular for a reason

who is doing what they are suppose to be doing?

lol

Right, which results in no jobs being done properly

public isn't, three branches aren't.

Incl. The job of upholding the constitution

nah its a megagon

how do you explain the mountains

they are the points of the megagon

Irregular torus

lol

I was speaking more about the consensus at the time, than the actual geometry.