He also ruined the only working London bicycle infrastructure program

in favour of something very... soft.

(which can probably be credited with a cyclist's death)

And directed the metropolitan police to waste their time pursuing crimes which present no risk to the public

In a time when the public is at growing risk of heinous violent crime

and looks to blame the steel, once more, for what is done with it.

@JimmyX Despite him being credibly linked to the unnecessary deaths of Londoners from rife incompetence at his office, I think that there's probably going to be enough public support for the guy to get him reelected.

He makes a great _pondering face_ for portraits, and that's probably enough alone to get Londoners to vote.

Don't forget, brown and muslim. It'd be super racist to vote against him.

Just like it's racist to criticize him.

ding ding ding

Well, it's worse than that.

These people think they're racist, so when they see that he can meet the basic standard of being able to _speak clearly, stand up reasonably straight, and comb his hair in the morning_, that is just about good enough for a Muslim.

Don't really see how. US just got done with a President like that.

Which is ironically very racist.

Similar to affirmative action. The bigotry of low expectations.

In this case, _very_ low expectations.

Yeah it’s racist to hold everyone to the same standards

But you know, rife incompetence at the behest of identity politics is just _part and parcel of living in a major city_.

I mean, just look at the finest city in America: Detroit.

Where reports of murder are followed up at least 9% of the time by an investigation.

>terrorism is part and parcel of living in a big city
>US has had like 3 since 2001 that made the news, including 9/11

(Granted, Detroit is probably mostly safe for visitors, and the various markets are nice and have a lot of quality produce; I by no means just want to shit on Detroit here)

Interestingly enough, source I'm looking at has the US having a few hundred since 2001.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/667929/terrorists-in-the-us-since-911-year-and-gender/

hmm

Depends on what terrorism is defined as I suppose

They are specifically referring to islamic terrorism

or "jihadist terrorism" in the terminology of that statista page.

Mein Jihad.

Note, they also mention "charge with". So some of those may have been conspiracy to commit, not actual terrorist attacks.

IC

I recall a couple stories of catching terrorists that made it into the US and were planning attacks but got caught.

Terrorism is initiation of the use of force for a political end. All laws imply the threat of violence. All governments are, by definition, terrorist organizations. Anarchist terrorism is counter terrorism.

Yeah, there have been _lots_ of those.

@halfthink this statistic is specific to people intending to support Islam through political violence.

Islam is based.

The most feminist religion

Cuck Norris II certainly agrees.

Yeah as long as being malicious isn’t the primary component of beating your wife it’s okay

Yeah, he would only beat his wife over his political opinions.

It's not malicious, he just wants to set her straight.