Message from @Scribblehatch
Discord ID: 499252929568702484
I'm afraid of such a thing.
I'm workshopping several solutions. Who DARES chase after someone who is ready to Home Alone any location
Fuckin' caltrops will fuck people up.
To be honest
They will pull the same shit they pull with vluster bombs and landmines
all women should carry nuclear armaments ... it says inthe 2nd amendment everyone has the rights to bear arms!
I hate that argument against guns "Yeah well the government has tanks"
...
Something tells me that you could probably make that law, if you made it about women.
"What are you gonna do, they own you anyway"
Niggaaaa...
Gun ownership is not for everyone. But every woman deserves the choice. I think 2A women should infiltrate the #ProChoice ranks. Would make for some interesting TV.
Riflemen are obnoxious to ANY government.
No kidding
In all honesty. Not every country needs a 2nd amendment.
Just the TOP DOG.
It would help if Germany had one right now?
Wait, saying women cant own firearms in the US?
But if the TOP DOG didn't have a 2nd amendment, at this very moment, they'd be super fucked.
Hick riflemen are a thorn in the U.S. government's side in countries where they are effectively _at war_.
Imagine if they had to show some sort of restraint, or sympathized with the insurgents!
its not corrupt now?
Oh it's corrupt but they wanna be corrupter.
Gun nuts are great.
They're our bad cop.
they could certainly be corrupterer
@GingaBomber In many cities, gun ownership is restricted. And women are disarmed as a result.
"Look I wanna be reasonable but my friend here wants answers."
I see,
they would just say get pepper spray
it totes works
I argued with some with some bonehead for hours why tranqs are a shitty idea for less than lethal ammo
And I would kinda agree (as a 21-year-old) that people under about 24 are probably not mentally mature enough to vote, and if maturity is truly a requirement, to carry firearms.
yet mature enough to die for your country
But the marginal increase in risk associated with people 18-24 carrying firearms seems to be less than the risk increase of those self-same people *not* carrying firearms.
(if the stats on defensive uses are to be believed)
Yeah, people are total hypocrites about this.
They want to send boys off to fight their wars, because they know we need the sheer physicality, malleability, and cheapness afforded by youth in order to get the performance we seek out of the military for the dollar we're willing to spend.
But by the same token, they will abuse and restrain those same boys in every imaginable way back home, for another five years if they have any hand in it.
does anyone know if yeezy or ben shapiro are being appointed un ambassador now