Message from @mer.at
Discord ID: 500258973945954334
I dunno.. 8% seems a lot
its an estimate
like.. 8% very political I can understand... but actual activists...
well it depends on what you define as an activist
people in a twitter mob can call themselves activists
Yet they never stood at one ever irl
like... i bet if it was 16m white supremacist mazi's marching the streets it would be seen more clearly as an issue
yes
8% is a lot?
8% active activists... yes
but wasn't it 8% were progressives?
And the actual activists were smaller?
thats like .. 16m potential terrorists
the german AFD has 17% in bavaria ....
afd members arent activists though are they?
didnt they rally in that one city in teh thousands?
and then Merkel said like "Wir schaffen dis"?
well, they are supposed to be racist nazi scum ...
arent most just interested in managing immigration and creating jobs etc?
yes
like all good right-wingers
oh wait, on sunday is the bavarian election
das ist gut ja?
also... @Dr.Wol its not just progressives .... its "progressive activists"
ah
Political Activism is an economy
people don't do it just out of the love of their hearts
yes, its a market
there are financial incentives
I wonder if the recent bing hit piece was somehow funded by google
I dont really see why they would need to tho :/
So 8% are progressive, of those, I'd guess that 1%, maybe at worst 10 goes on the streets...
And most of them might be college indoctrinated as well
8% progressive activists
meaning ... active
The right needs to figure out the activism game
yeah that means they are whining all over twitter
that's activism to them
that would be a mistake
I get what you're saying with active Wacka,
But im with Payne on this one,
"Liberals" in america want to take away freedoms
"Activists" range from people on the streets, to antifa, to armchair generals on twitter
the right has always traditionally thought of activism as below them