lul

But do they have to be elderly or something too?

See, you'd think that would be insulting.

Being LGBT is a disability.

But no, that's "progress".

@Spectre9 Again, no charity to anything "on the right"

You don't have to be disabled, elderly, or a injured worker.

Nope

My aunt would be livid.

You just have to be gay, bisexual, or transgender.

Now that's dumb.

LGBT isn't a disability.

I find that insulting.

I am disabled.

That's the kind of thing that would make lots of people very livid. How'd this not get attention? Have a link from an official source? It's the kind of thing to float around some news outlets...

Yet they are saying LGBT group, who can work, who can do things I can't are able to draw from SSI.

LGBT

As a disability

Hah

That’s ironic

That’s how most people viewed LGBT people 60 years ago

Or more

https://www.ssa.gov/people/same-sexcouples/

They are eligible for benefits.

Couples.

My aunt would be double-livid.

She's a single lesbian.

https://socialsecuritydisabilityadvocatesusa.com/lgbt-disability-benefits

Still doesn't qualify. 😎

Looks more like they're saying they treat it the same as marriage for calculating eligibility.

This is wrong... seriously wrong.

Yet no one knows about the abuse on the system by LGBT community.

OR am I misunderstanding this?

If they are getting benefits a hetero-sexual married couple is not getting, that's newsworthy.

Is it?

If they're getting the same benefits, I don't see a problem.

you ,must be misunderstanding, obviously nobody can claim anything just by saying he's bisexual

If it's just saying that homosexual marriages count as marriages under Obergfell, it's the legally correct action

@Inquisition typo. Meant to have not in there. Edited the original comment.

Oh okay.

I see that now, pratel. Sorry, dude.