people weren't running around screaming about college kids drinking too much and fucking
It happen in the 70's, it happen in the 80's, it happen in the 90's, and it happen in the 2000's.
certainly not to the extent it was called rape
I'm drunk every school day.
It wasn’t everywhere on the media
People had their lives destroyed many times.
yes and the media gins shit up
It doesn't even have to be national news.
Just because you didn’t see it didn’t mean it wasn’t happening
It just has to be news in their town they live in.
Their lives would be destroyed.
Do you think the accused should have a chance to get their life back on track?
You know what. You're right. We should ban guns too.
OR are they condemned to a life of not being able to survive?
I am not even talking about banning guns.
I am talking about accuser and accused.
yeah but guns have destroyed lives
Guns are inanimated objects.
Yes.
You can't punish a gun.
You can only punish those who did the killing.
The person behind the gun.
With Oprahs argument we'd be banning newspapers, online articles and cameras
But at the same time... you are not setting out to destroy a person's life.
>looks across pond
Because those are the tools used to ruin false rape accused lives.
You are basically trying to jump between two extremes.
While I am trying to set a balance.
@Scribblehatch you do realize im not making that actual argument. I'm trying to draw a line
To protect the accused and accuser... innocent until proven guilty.
Teh chance of redemption.
Thanks of that nature.
You are giving us two choices instead of middle ground.
dude. You suggested preventing people from knowing not JUST the accuser and or accused but then even leaving it under wraps AFTER a conviction
Whatever you do, do it to impress yourself.
Prevent people from knowing so there is no mob justice.
lol juts
The mob will and can attack the accuse after they get out of prison.
there we go. Fixed it
Not allow them to live anywhere or work anywhere.
Give them no chance of redemption.
