Message from @JULZIFICATOR
Discord ID: 502498880626229258
even though i know hes not
I don't need to convince anybody that we're being invaded by illegals. The facts already confirm that.
You can argue that it's a misleading term, that's fine
But it's not technically incorrect
but all his solutions and reactions are the reasonable responses to a violent invasion
Not really
IE extremely unrealistic for the way hes using it
>yeah kill everyone trying to come over
>not unreasonable
Law stated in... Can't remember if it was Denmark or Sweden, maybe both
If you caught people crossing the ice you shot them
Pretty sure that's not still on the books
There's nothing at all unrealistic about protecting a national border with deadly force.
But it's not like there isn't a precedent
my concern really didn't get answered but I guess I didn't make it clear. What should I do if the bias response team or something comes for me because of a meme I posted?
pick one
Well, I think that the optics of that are bad.
A wall would be really helpful.
Oh they are
Because you don't need to beat or restrain anyone who hasn't crossed the wall.
Hoi chums, what's going on?
hence my point
Israel also shoots people who charge the border afaik
The US needs to create a no-man's land several miles wide on the Mexican side of the border.
that there are reasonable ways to approach it
@LunaticHell apparently there is a horde of migrants attempting to enter the U.S. right now.
that wont cause a response form teh international community
and in turn empower the fucktard activists in teh US
Huh
which is the last thing we need
The 'intenational community' is a club for third-world shitholes.
I'd disagree with miles of no man's land.
@devpav if you're familiar with the geography of the border, a no-man's land on either side of the border is largely impossible.
except in the most remote areas.
Also, until recently the Mexican government hasn't had that much interest in preventing exits.
lol doesnt matter what you fuckign think of them dude
they still have power
since the costs are inevitably lower when they let people exit
Largely impossible like US GDP growth >2%, I know.
no, you retard