Message from @Dan V
Discord ID: 503212712340357130
ofc just in regards to minimizing it
Well as cities grow, there’s more building upward. However, would the provision of public and emergency service diminish if more buildings were built larger with less stories?
ro you'd have to travel farther to respond to a emergency call
so the inverse
you'd need more boots on the ground
But you have an entire road, whereas, if a fire is on x floor
Theres also cost. If you're constructing a building, you need to pay for land. Smaller plots cost less. So you build up
calls come from anywhere ro, not just floors, floors are easy to traverse vs traffic
In the case of fire, there's also sprinklers
you are talking a 2 minute climb of stairs vs a 20 minutes sit in traffic
in the case its more spread out you need more people everywhere on standby
The idea is that the streets are wide enough to accommodate a truck’s ability to get through
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
Are you talking about 6 lane streets?
I was thinking double wide service lanes
DOUBLE WIDE
i dono why but that cracks me up
X X L
@Ottobon is right. You'd need to hire way more people in order to cover the additional area
😎 🍆
we are ground animals, and exploration of regions are dictated by that, that will never chance in regard to physical ability to respond to *situations*
@King Canuck liberals don't say that. Socialists say that
no u
we no fly like birbs, *cry*
i tried to engineer nice flying platform but didnt know about airfoils at the time wasn like wewewew
Okay so if you were given a very large land area, you would build upward?
Not at first, no
upward/downward is more efficient
for tight spaces
But you run out of land at some point
thasts all
All the way downward
And you gotta build up
mole men 😎
why travel across town when you can just use the elevator
building vertically is better
Calgary in Canada is very spread out
It takes a while to get anywhere
WTF OMG ARE YOU CANADIAN
NOOOOoooooooooooooooooooo