Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 686944911760556040
if that's their standard
we should create a template and include their snippet about why it's all the same message
> To allow us to reply promptly, and to ensure we use our licence fee resources as efficiently as possible, we’re sending this response to everyone. We’re sorry we can’t reply individually, but we hope this will address most of the points raised.
Or response should be:
> To allow us to reply promptly, and to ensure we use our own resources as efficiently as possible, we’re all sending this response to you. We’re sorry we can’t reply individually, but we hope this will address most of the points raised.
I’m going to wait and see what AA is going to say
It was his idea.
true
@Academic Agent gay op when
Replace Ash Sarkar with Tommy Robinson in that letter. I doubt they would defend him by saying,
- "Mr Robinson is responsible for the posts on his social media account, not the BBC."
a debate between tommy robinson and ash would be good ratings
$
But giving Tommy air time would mean that the BBC are giving him a platform even though giving Ash air time doesn’t give her a platform
the likes of r/uk don't even want Nigel Farage on the BBC
well that doesnt surprise me
dumbfuck population buying stupid shit
Why would I wanna listen to either of them
Tommy is a criminal thug
Ash is an idiot
people like drama
I like drama in my entertainment
not my politics
I bet 5 bucks you would watch it... if bbc did a debate between ash sarkar and tommy robinson... just to see what dumb sht they would say
Ya I'd watch it if it's on
But I wouldn't want it on to begin with
If I got a chocolate bar near me I'll eat it, but I wouldn't go out of my way to buy that chocolate bar
thats all I was saying... it would get high ratings
or maybe ratings isnt the right word... it would have a lot of viewers...
also sounds like you might lack discipline... I have a bowl full of chocolate bars right next to me - and I know I wont eat any until at least 8pm
A debate between Yaxley and Sarkar would be pointless
depends what the point is... if its to get a lot of viewers, then it wouldnt
if its to have some sort of meaningful debate... then it would be pointless
It won't have any meaningful debate
What would they even talk about lmao
if tommy was there... probably grooming gangs and how labour is supporting them
Both parties are just as responsible and complicate
That is what should be pushed instead of "muh labour"
clearly london is racist AF 😛 ... they want to elect someone whos going to stay out of the way of all the young black kids stabbing each other