yeah this is from r/uk

they're fuming

https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/fo2o7m/watch_wetherspoon_boss_tells_staff_to_work_in/

REEEEE!

Surprised FF isn't in here sperging about it 🙂

if you actually listen to the video, it paints a totally different picture

to their reeeing

and the headline

@Crafty Can you post the original video?

https://twitter.com/Dittomoogle/status/1242177322213662730

People read/watch stuff like this out of context and get the wrong idea

If you're contracted, you'll get paid, simple as

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_testing

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/386620678343884820/691982792451686410/Screenshot_20200324-121159_Opera.jpg

They'll cause Weatherspoons to go bust like to these Millennial workers give too shits about preserving Jobs for others in the future or do they kill a business then move on?

typical tards

that, sir, is a manufactured outrage

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/350012012052611072/691981672882896896/IMG_20200324_114951.png

@Eccles Some pure cringe.

That's massively inappropriate

'some of us nerdy cops teehee, giggle' <:disgusteng:595338918044500041>

https://iea.org.uk/coronomics-the-case-against-corona-keynesianism/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUD1RvFWzeE

Who is Michael Brooks?

@Crafty Keynesianism doesn't work.

And why are you posting 4yr old livestreams?

Because he is a Leftist Neet @Eccles

Why, is there a rule here that says streams over a certain time period are not allowed? LMao

Because they're typically current affairs, so it could be considered misleading or fake news to post without context

"This is a retroactive look"

Its just not relevent

Its a fun video of Sargon getting owned

I understand why you wont like it

There are plenty of videos of Sargon getting owned

He's no good at confrontational discussions

And let's face it, most leftists aren't any good at any other kind

When I talk to people about a subject, I want to leave that conversation having learned something - typically an understanding of the other person's position is, where it comes from, and what motivated it. This allows you to contrast how it differs from their own, whether it has/what the flaws are, and whether your own position has flaws that could be addressed and the position needs to change

Owen coming at you with another hot take
https://twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/1242186414349078531

No Eccles you don't. You just double down on your stupidity like how yesterday when we were talking about Cuba and US foreign policy and it's sanctions through UN and it's institutions.
When I asked you guys yesterday if the US can do whatever it wants, are other countries allowed to take the same action, you response was that the US is not a moral state, and the other moron responded with well the US is a hegemon so it validates their actions. So you don't learn jackshit from your stupid arguments you just double down on your dumb assumptions because the overwhelming evidence against your positions destroy your premise time and again.

U-turn is such a buzzword

the discussion didn't start about US foreign policy, and nobody involved intended talking about it