Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 696003535585673247
I understand you can have subversion and anti-national thought in a liberal society
But I think as long as the government enforces a pro-nation stance and policy it could work
For example I like the idea of free speech from liberalism
I want a powerful government being pro-nation
same
I'm not a lolbertarian
And I dont fetishise freedom as the moral endgame
i think freedom is very important but i understand it has its downsides, and should be limited in some areas
Yes
It can be a real slippery slope
Give people too much rope and they fuck it up, as Roger Waters said
Communism rots the body and liberalism rots the soul
National survival needs to be top priority of any nation/people, otherwise what is the point?
i agree
Hmm
controversial opinion... the entire reason hitler won the election, was because of the KPD and their creation of Antifaschistische
yeah that's fair
yes that would be unsurprising
he blamed communists for everything and, with communists rioting in the streets, people had reason to be afraid
or "social fascists" as they called them
Social Democrats were kinda based around that time, they allowed the Freikorps to do their job
booo, starmer won
britain should probably have its own anti-communist corps
Hear hear
The J*wish/Bolshevik threat in Germany was very clear
wonder what it would be like if the whole of germany had fallen to the soviets before wwII
Nobody would let it
They were all funded by the USSR
Yes, but would they be able to stop it
and the USSR was a huge threat to the way of life of Western Europe and America
Especially in a scenario if Poland fell to the Bolsheviks in 1920
You must remember germany had to strip and mothball its army
Would France and britain want to fight an upcoming comintern in the 1920s right after WW1?