Buy yourself a canned happy meal

1. do jack shit to stop the spread. 2. get massive numbers of infected. 3. panic <:smugon:512048583806025739>

> 1. do jack shit to stop the spread. 2. get massive numbers of infected. 3. panic <:smugon:512048583806025739>
@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ

Wot

It didint have to become an national emergency if you just did your part to stop the spread from chyna trump <:smugon:512048583806025739>

Excuse me
but you helped them through Harvard

be more like taiwan numba yuan

Taiwan man IS worthy of all my respect
Indeed

@Sq crcl I have 99,5% 25 L of propan-2-ol what do?

<:smugon:512048583806025739>

👀

Get a lab

already have

Woooooooow

is used for disinfectant there

But it's also a great ingredient

Tedious to produce

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/deutsche-bank-deep-cleans-london-office-after-coronavirus-case-143956587.html

Deutsche Bank is the 2nd or 1st main coffer for the EU

fuck of germ

i have uv lamp reeeeeeeeee

@Sq crcl not by italy?

Caught **red** handed

This cannot be

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/twitter-wont-remove-chinese-officials-conspiracy-theory-suggesting-us-army-secretly

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/minf.202000028

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160148 oh yes

https://doi.org/10.5607/en20009

what's the napkin-version of that PDF?

if I understood it, looks like there might be some meds soon to test on live subjects

First one is a paper on using Deep Learning to screen lots of compounds to come up with a few thousand that should probably be tested.

Second is since you can get both a positive screening for normal flu does not mean you don't have the WuFlu as well.

I'm actually not sure what is special about the third, that seems to be a description of how most of the current kits work:
> This protocol shows an accuracy and sensitivity limit of 1-10 virus particles as we tested with a known lentivirus. The cost for each sample is estimated to be less than 15 US dollars. Overall time it takes for an entire protocol is estimated to be less than 4 hours. We propose a cost-effective, quick-and-easy method for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 at any conventional Biosafety Level II laboratories that are equipped with a rtPCR machine. Our newly developed protocol should be helpful for a first-hand screening of the asymptomatic virus-carriers for further prevention of transmission and early intervention and treatment for the rapidly propagating virus.

well .. about that second, I know some doctors here, who have been playing around with concept of:

> The flu test are fast and trustworthy. Sooooo ... if a coofer that looks like flu comes in, we do quick Flu A and Flu B tests, and if those both fail, we can send it to do that long-ass Wuflu test

It works, it's just not a foolproof way of finding out if they have WuFlu.

I really get annoyed by people, who complain that "there is not enough testing", because they think that doing an antigen kit is as fast as taking a pregnency test

That third one is actually about coming up with possible self administered kits and wide distribution of them as I read it over further.

read the full article first maybe <:smugon:512048583806025739>

@ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ lemme guess - the tests still will take long-ass time and a lot of manpower

(I really don't want to read scientific papers, since I am currently learning about PostgreSQL, that I will need for my next job)