Message from @Andrew Popa 2.0
Discord ID: 686998238817288350
@Thundermark How is an "open relationship" a conservative concept? I am confusion <:smugon:512048583806025739>
mfw the standard for being based is that of being uncucked <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Welcome to Clown World
open house is not how it works either
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Seesh, why so defensive about your open relationships? It already sounds like you’re not having a fun time with them.
Plus, I’d like to see the response to my other points because that was my weakest.
But all you do here is **declare** that I’m wrong, but why am I wrong? The name is a *open* relationship, surely any man your gf brings in is allowed
“/sigh
I tried.
There's literally *zero* incentive to me wasting any more time arguing w/ ppl who have already made up their minds based on a fallacious preconceived notion & are not willing to so much as *listen.*”
Ok then don’t respond, you’ve quit, we’re done, stop typing.
what were you expecting, people to embrace the ideal of polyamory?
Dude just make your point and argument in a precise way, please stop sperging
This is interesting
instill the virtues of why I should be letting other guys drill my wife
A closed polyamorous relationship is not an open relationship
Imagine calling an international market that's closed off to other markets an open market. No, it's a single market, not an open market.
“no, I'm done wasting my time on the willfully ignorant” then please stop typing here if you quit, we got other debates
> In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one's own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very purpose of the covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. **They – the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism – will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order.**
- Hans Hermann Hoppe
The owner of a subreddit entirely dedicated towards bashing Libertarianism cites a Libertarian philosopher
We are reaching levels of big brain that shouldn't be possible
I'm curious of your actual argument of why I should be accepting of polyamory
@Andrew Popa 2.0 Hoppe and other Paleolibertarians are fellow travelers
“The owner of a subreddit entirely dedicated towards bashing Libertarianism cites a Libertarian philosopher”
Wait, so citing the source you’re criticizing is bad?
My guy literally made a video endorsing the Alt Right at the height of it, before Spencer (partially) and some other retards drove it into the ground
Oh he’s not criticizing my bad
Why would I criticize someone advocating for removing degenerates
*Because why can't you be an inconsistent illogical progressive barbarian like the rest of us reeee*
The term "progressive" as it's being applied in the real world is starting to lose its meaning just the same as "liberal"
There's not much progressive left about the progressive, and not much conservative about the conservatives.
Hot take: Milo was expelled by Christian fundamentalists for the right reasons. The SJW's may think they successfully baited the actual tradcons, but in fact they played right into their hands.
In short, Milo was a subversive force to proper conservatives.
No shit. He tried to co-opt the term "Alt Right" in 2016 to mean people Right Wingers who are supportive of homosexuality, trans rights but are also for corporate tax cuts and dislike political correctness. Almost the exact opposite of what it really was.
milo is a LARP
only in it for $
Charlie Kirk is Milo's watered down version in a business suit
And they're doing it very smartly. Gotta be more vigilant and go into the offense to expose them.