Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 690705747700350996


2020-03-20 22:18:42 UTC  

HAH your debate style is pathetic. I absolutely destroyed all your arguments and now you act like a petty child.

2020-03-20 22:18:56 UTC  

I think you're not being rational rn <:smugon:512048583806025739>

2020-03-20 22:19:18 UTC  

Here. Listen to these. You might learn something and change your mind!

2020-03-20 22:19:25 UTC  

I won't, thanks

2020-03-20 22:20:55 UTC  

Gets absolutely destroyed in a debate. Refuses to listen to good arguments by the person he got destroyed by. Good job you! Keep your evasion up im sure it will lead you to great places in life

2020-03-20 22:21:30 UTC  

We're talking to someone who thinks it's *objectively better* to be selfish than to be selfless. Referring to reason and rationality (has yet to provide the reasoning <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> )

2020-03-20 22:23:23 UTC  

Selfishness works better than selflessness if properly harnessed

2020-03-20 22:24:22 UTC  

I prefer a good balance between self-interest and caring for others.

2020-03-20 22:25:06 UTC  

There's no *objective* counter to any of these preferences. Selfish, selfless, middle ground, doesn't matter. *Objectively* they're all the same.

2020-03-20 22:25:19 UTC  

LOL

2020-03-20 22:25:52 UTC  

Only a subjective mind can have preferences in the first place. So to argue that it's objective to prefer one over the other is just silly.

2020-03-20 22:42:35 UTC  

Its not about preference. There is only 1 truth.

2020-03-20 22:46:03 UTC  

Yeah yeah your morals are derived from reason, and you have the correct smarts, the moral smarts. I get it.

2020-03-20 23:22:29 UTC  

You dont get it. Thats the problem here

2020-03-20 23:29:16 UTC  

Yesh. If only I had your smartsh, then my moralsh would be the shame as yoursh.

2020-03-20 23:36:33 UTC  

You also need to deal with the literature

2020-03-20 23:36:51 UTC  

Which you obviously have not

2020-03-20 23:37:14 UTC  

My moralsh are obvioushly too dumb

2020-03-20 23:37:52 UTC  

Yes because they are not derived from reason

2020-03-20 23:38:02 UTC  

Yesh, reashon. I shee.

2020-03-20 23:38:24 UTC  

I need more reashon around my anush.

2020-03-20 23:52:51 UTC  

Weird, but perhaps expected responses from a irrational ancap

2020-03-20 23:57:55 UTC  

What do you guys think:

Will we see more, or less births 9months from now?

2020-03-20 23:58:39 UTC  

One argument is that the people now due to the lockdowns are spending a whole lot more time together. Couples especially.

2020-03-20 23:59:33 UTC  

My argument is that it's the opposite because of the uncertainty of the future, couples will rather wait a year or longer to see what are their odds.

2020-03-21 00:00:50 UTC  

Yeah many don’t know how long this will last so it’s better to not take chances

2020-03-21 00:25:05 UTC  

its a nothing burger

2020-03-21 00:25:22 UTC  

only people at risk should be quarantined

2020-03-21 01:56:42 UTC  

But then you do exactly the same

2020-03-21 01:56:59 UTC  

R0= most likely 6 or 7 or even higher

2020-03-21 02:00:41 UTC  

I mean, I get it. It's hard to accept the harsh reality.

2020-03-21 02:43:47 UTC  

top kek

2020-03-21 02:44:14 UTC  

biggus dickus style

2020-03-21 02:46:08 UTC  

> Fiscal Impact by Race in 2018

2020-03-21 02:46:43 UTC  

Updated article based on recent data

2020-03-21 03:10:58 UTC  

Thanks **Ford**, that saved me some time.

2020-03-21 03:27:57 UTC