Idk I think aggression includes violence, but can encompass extreme speech. I'm not trying to be an SJW here, but violence is violence. My understanding of Micro Aggressions were subtle things, where calling someone a nigger would be macro

And hitting someone is assault

@Timcast I really think he is missing something about how big Russian involvement is in the left.

extreme speech is illegal

but thats not violence

I'm not even talking about legality

theft is illegal

And I'm not saying extreme speech is violence

THEN GO TO JAIL KYLE CAUSE YOU STOLE MY HEART

@DanteMenace do you know about russian Duganism ?

im not going to jail

I think the progressive left are like fairies, and if we all chant and truly believe, "I don't believe in the progressive left," they'll just wink out of existence.

It shouldn't be illegal, but by the definition of aggression I think screaming "Get gassed you Kike" is pretty aggressive

my commie potential govnor wants to abolish jail/police/prison

i used to get mail addressed to kyke judkins

did you guys see the Hugh Mungus video? chick screeching at that guy, i think she claimed him saying his name was "Hugh Mungus" was an act of violence against her

thats a micro aggression

because i was dating a jewish girl

rip

Khazar milkers <:PogChamp:388980101728960535>

Yeah Hugh Mungus is more normie than normies

Everyone knows Hugh Mungus

All these miniature agressions

@Walsp Duganism, not sure if you know anything about it let me know, I would like to know how it effect Putin.

is it a micro aggression when putin flies shit into restricted air space

I think that counts, yeah

what a brave new world

literally triggered rn

luckily no ammo

or it would be ww3

i can't get over all these new phrases, like 1,000 new words to describe being offended

im off ended

and slightly on ended

Whoa

the basic understanding of Putin is to understand Duganism and to understand duganims you have to understand Political alighment . Russia does not see itself as right wing or Left wing rather it rejects Liberalism . and It embraces Nationalism But Socialist Tendences . It uses ideology As a tool not as a definite solution so if they will achieve a victory with Conservatism it will be done and push the people in that direction if anarchism will achieve the goal they will use that

or is it off started

That's for running the 100m

did i hear a phrase correctly the other day 'stochastic terrorism' wtf is that?

i fucking

hate