Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 687691890782765105
who want s to ban guns anyway
"If you substitute in ar-15 where he says ak47 there's little difference between your common Democrat argument" - This assumes that there is no difference between 1980s America and 2020 America
the difference is QUITE signficant
The difference is irrelevant if you're making a constitutional argument.
Democrats in the 80s at least were willing to give and take
Now they just want to take my tax dollars and give it to illegal immigrants
And Reagan had more important issues to contend with. Just limiting the AK-47 isn't the same as instituting a full-scale ban on all assault rifles
Reagan was a movie star
not a hunter
it's unrealistic to expect the Chief Exec to be an expert in everything
You're focusing on the one gun he named, not the argument he made
Sir this is a meme channel
Since when does the Federal Gov respect the 10th Ammendment?
Constitutional Argument?
As a rule, the Federal gov dismisses constitutional law
and the States let them
So that's your stance?
You support that?
Is that what the glory of Reagan is to you?
Implying that States conceded their rights in the same manner as those who are anti-assault rifle are demanding.
Or are you wrestling with some cognatice dissonance here because I pointed out a flaw in an otherwise solid president?
Given the precedence, their logic isn't wrong. If you allow people to break rules and make exceptions when it suits you, what do you expect?
Do you worship the man, or the good he did?
I'm pointing out your blatent inconstency
Mine?
I don't see any people regularly bitching about the violation of States Rights
Pfft. You're not in my discord.
Yet, you'll try to rest on the Constitutional argument alone when it comes to banning assault rifles?"
You're making MAJOR assumptions.
No, i'd demandig you STATE your assumptions explictly
The Constituional argument is a flimsy one because you are apperhently quite satisfied with the Federal Gov violating it in other areas