Geeze, I didn't do anything did I?

I'm sorry 😦

No your fine hes being aggresive

*I'm like tired at noon, and I can't make sense of much right now*

just ask a mod about it if your unsure i dont even know myself

tim does type in general from time to time

he gives updates on stories

apparently we're at the stage that this is a question we should ask... https://twitter.com/newscientist/status/1058072358144131075?s=20

Hmmm

that is a good question

It depends on what community you're in.

because if we are willing to share personal information online

no its not... everyone has the right to prvacy

you have the right to it

Huh? How so?

but if you disclose your information willingly

What is the moral code of altruism? The basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue and value.

Do not confuse altruism with kindness, good will or respect for the rights of others. These are not primaries, but consequences, which, in fact, altruism makes impossible. The irreducible primary of altruism, the basic absolute, is self-sacrifice—which means; self-immolation, self-abnegation, self-denial, self-destruction—which means: the self as a standard of evil, the selfless as a standard of the good.

*No one said that a person should exist for self sacrifice. Perhaps we have a few misconceptions on definitions*

lul

thats what the philosophers say and what the logical extreme is

you just want people to debate you

and nobody went to voice chat

sigh

no I hold these views im just baiting most the time

Well there you go

Do not hide behind such superficialities as whether you should or should not give a dime to a beggar. That is not the issue. The issue is whether you do or do not have the right to exist without giving him that dime. The issue is whether you must keep buying your life, dime by dime, from any beggar who might choose to approach you. The issue is whether the need of others is the first mortgage on your life and the moral purpose of your existence. The issue is whether man is to be regarded as a sacrificial animal. Any man of self-esteem will answer: “No.” Altruism says: “Yes.”

if your baiting you dont need to call people Retard for not understanding What the definition means

smh

Okay, under that specific definition, fine, I agree.

altruism is self sacrifice it has been warped to mean kindness because thats more appealing to a normal man

but what the philosophers hold is a different altruism

which is the one being pushed

No, I thought they meant the same thing.

See, I am not too keen on scholarly things.

not to the philosophers and for a consistent idea

theres a debate channel for this stuff

he doesnt care

nobody wants to debate him

so he comes to general

Huh? This turned into a debate?

if you tell him theres a debate channel he will go on about this is a political channel to justify dragging it in here