this is what I mean when I say it's impossible to argue such a point. the only difference is your own conception of what the word's inner nuance is, and there's no real meaning in fighting for such obviously mundane points
can sit here all day and play the semantic philosopher game, or you could actually try to discuss issues of human experience and societal function - like philosophers must surely be supposed to.
semantics-focused philosophers have been distracting academia for decades now, and it wrought the current state of societal norms. destruction. semantics is clearly not the way forward.
