Message from @Eden
Discord ID: 689490530362458198
Loo
Loo
@NinjaQuick They literally cannot be
<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>
THERE IS NO TRUTH
NOTHING IS REAL
NIHILISM EVERYWHERE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
ooh boy you've attracted nihilist thought
Except a word without meaning is just a series of sounds.
The only way a definition can be the premise of an argument is if you sit down prior to tue argument and agree on a specific definition
So you're fucking retarded. You're misusing the logical fallacy.
Anything else is fallacious
exactly
Just because it can be wrong doesn't mean it is always wrong.
You're really bad at thinking , phad.
It's always wrong
Absolutism is a position of small minds
The only time it's acceptable is if the other person specifically agrees to it
That sounds less like an argument and more like communism.
An appeal to definition is not the same as the basis of language which is common understanding of the meaning of a word.
I didn't say it was
Appeal to definition is pretending a definition can be a premise of an argument
Your stance of demanding that Eden abide by your definition of altruism is an example of appeal to definition.
definitions should be obvious to each participant beforehand, and if they are not, should only be resolved in favour of one participant. if the definition proposed is meaningless or simply not commonly accepted, the participant is thrown from a cliff. that's how fucking mad I am at semantics ruining the fields of academia that should've saved the last few decades.
It almost never can be
Whereas the group here agree with the common vernacular
You're the odd man out
And so you fall back on appealing to your definition.
That's what the basis of what you linked is
Not that all appeals are wrong, it's that appealing for the sake of appealing is wrong, which is what you, not Eden, did.
He had tonclarify where he is coming from.
@Greasy Definitions simply should be agreed on your not argued at all
You demanded he see it your way, and he refused.
Like I said, you can't even hold a philosophical debate without citing arbitration by anonymous entities.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
MY STOCKS