Message from @Labyrinth Snake

Discord ID: 687070852130406458


2020-03-10 22:51:12 UTC  

VP Jack

2020-03-10 22:51:17 UTC  

who would become President within a year

2020-03-10 22:51:21 UTC  

bow before me

2020-03-10 22:51:23 UTC  

47th President

2020-03-10 22:51:33 UTC  

Plausible deniability

2020-03-10 22:51:34 UTC  

therefore, if someone cannot remember, logic would dictate consent was implied

2020-03-10 22:51:59 UTC  

@Labyrinth Snake wtf is that

2020-03-10 22:52:18 UTC  

Matt was drunk, Sarah was drunk. Sarah couldn't consent

2020-03-10 22:52:23 UTC  

RAaaaape

2020-03-10 22:52:25 UTC  

does VP stand for "Vagina Perturbed"?

2020-03-10 22:52:25 UTC  

or at least, it would be indistingushable from 'implied consent'

2020-03-10 22:52:34 UTC  

<:npc:502497359419408384>

2020-03-10 22:52:49 UTC  

that's false logic though, irreversal

2020-03-10 22:53:00 UTC  

@Jack One Punch Man

2020-03-10 22:53:06 UTC  

vaginal perturbation

2020-03-10 22:53:06 UTC  

sarah couldn't DENY consent

2020-03-10 22:53:13 UTC  

It is npc double standards

2020-03-10 22:53:28 UTC  

thus them both being drunk, reconciles the logic as 'not rape'

2020-03-10 22:53:28 UTC  

Vice President

2020-03-10 22:53:49 UTC  

Man perp woman victim

2020-03-10 22:54:16 UTC  

I miss Anonymous. They would go to war against Digital Censorship on the Internet e.g YouTube

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687070850037317671/image0.jpg

2020-03-10 22:54:18 UTC  

@Irreversal it's actually more fundamental; women by default think with 'logic 0'

2020-03-10 22:54:25 UTC  

men by 'logic 1'

2020-03-10 22:54:29 UTC  

Somehow a man being drunk is different to a woman being drunk

2020-03-10 22:54:36 UTC  

women care more about FAILURE to act

2020-03-10 22:54:49 UTC  

men more about ACTING when not appropriate

2020-03-10 22:55:20 UTC  

we are hard wired to think this way and in the past, it was ok; cause we had seperate spheres of influence

2020-03-10 22:55:34 UTC  

now, women are trying to apply THEIR logic, to OUR world

2020-03-10 22:56:11 UTC  

Logic-Hi vs Logic-Lo

2020-03-10 22:56:13 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687071330872590354/image0.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687071331287564338/image1.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687071331514187816/image2.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687071331744743471/image3.jpg

2020-03-10 22:56:14 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687071345032429624/image0.jpg

2020-03-10 22:57:22 UTC  

What is acting when not appropriate

2020-03-10 22:58:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687072035322724372/image0.jpg

2020-03-10 22:59:14 UTC  

❤️

2020-03-10 22:59:23 UTC  

Men see consequences of an action rather clearly. if i hit you, i GET hit back. However, failure to act when there is an existing duty isn't something we always pick up on @Irreversal

2020-03-10 23:00:15 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/678530619621507073/687072356463935508/image0.jpg

2020-03-10 23:00:47 UTC  

I can tell that was drawn by an incel

2020-03-10 23:01:32 UTC  

women are the complete opposite. if an infant gets hurt, it's because she was negligent at insuring the child wasn't exposed to unnescary risk. they tend to hold others to that same logic. Forget an anniversary rather than specific malscious action.

2020-03-10 23:01:32 UTC  

@JackH670 What was drawn by Incel?

2020-03-10 23:01:45 UTC  

the cartoon directly above that statement

2020-03-10 23:01:59 UTC  

SJW?