@XoviaHarmile

>Diaries were written in ballpoint pen
>Ballpoint pens werent widely available until the very late 40s in Europe

<:swet:671404160393936948>

no one cares

Money machine go Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

https://tenor.com/ycXH.gif

Ha Ha Boobies go Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

@Son of Rome There are 2 notes written by biographers in Frank's journals after the war and numbers written on each page for clarification purposes, also done after the war, written with a ballpoint pen

The rest was written by Frank using fountain pen

I am quite convinced that none of the people who have made the claim that the journal is a hoax have actually bothered to look at the original manuscript of the diary

Do you get paid for zionist shilling? Just curious @Andrew Popa 2.0

And any claim that it was written with a ballpoint pen is simply fucked in the ass by the fact that the journal was first published in the Netherlands in 1947, while ballpoint pens were popularized in Europe in the early 50s

Seems you have an answer for everything when it comes to the JQ

Makes me wonder...

That's all.

"Seems you have an answer for everything " It's called reading comprehension

My blood boils whenever I see internet conspiratards make false claims

Asked my sister how she's doing in this lockdown thing with three kids and her husband off driving trucks. "We're ready, we have guns."

We Americans are so much more ready for this than you kids over in Europe

Another hot big brain take from the states. Cheers patriot.

@Andrew Popa 2.0 False claims, according to your big nosed masters

False claims according to anyone who actually bothers to look for the source material

Not gonna argue with you bro, it's getting a little blue in here

"Oy vey goy, did you not read the lies we published?"

Yes, why even back up your claims when you can just throw an ad hominem, followed by an argument from personal incredulity before wrapping it all up in a "meme" in order to make all the other conspiratards flock to your mental manure, thus creating an argument ad populum

Why have 1 logical fallacy when you can have 3

https://twitter.com/Imamofpeace/status/1241363730253762560

https://twitter.com/DailyMailUK/status/1241353439441047557

Because of course any source which disagrees with your precious and important beliefs is a lie concocted by the big nose people and anyone who disagrees with you is a paid zionist shill

Because reasons

Don't bother. @Andrew Popa 2.0

Either back up your claim or retract it

those fools they took all the toilet paper and ignored the booze hahahahaha i was one step ahead

@Andrew Popa 2.0 MR is retarded

Why expect anything else

Not sure which is cringier, treating General chat as a good faith debate stage or believing a blatant coomer fanfic

Either way, yikes bro @Andrew Popa 2.0

"I see this as an absolute win" @King Canuck