Message from @Lucienne d'Anwyl
Discord ID: 695134954971201549
you can see scribbles
Yes there is
1 character = 1 word is efficient in its own right
but until you understand what sound each letters make
These people aren't living in a vacuum
you cant decipher them
Or more so phrase
They'd still be exposed on occasion to merchants, priests, lords, writings
The thing is that you only need a few words to get the gist
It's like background radiation
You pick and patch it up it's how the human brain works
no i mean
i guess you could. LLike its feasable that someone could read but not speak
hearing someone speaking a language
wont teach you to read that language
at all
until you learn how a letter sounds
Language is zipfian so if you learn the most common 1000 words you're literally good with 90% of words by usage
No but seeing a merchant point to something and say
Etc
Like signs
You really think signage didn't exist?
how many signs do you think there were back then
Yes the average peasant was illiterate
roman milestones for example
didnt have words on them
they had numerals
But if you wanted very terrible spelling
thats an example of signage
but no words
You could get them to spell something out
I'll go find it you're reminding me of some history thing I watched that made me rethink history
The whole aspect of yes humans back then uneducated
But our brains are quite adaptable and psychology wasn't different back then on a base level
@Osbornia shad does quite a bit on the topic of the view that people back then were stupid, including on literacy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kISM2od3BJ0
Like a peasant that's had plenty of exposure to a trading port could probably identify basic stuff
They weren't stupid
People also inherently like and desire languages so attempting to establish communication over writing makes sense
Like the majority of China peasants
Not stupid