Furthermore, you're treating "Sins of the father" as valid in the case of the wealthy

it's not black and white

people win large sums of money all the time

they aren't good with it

You are calling for having people with greater incomes being taxed more

had a good friend who had 2 wealthy relatives die

first got 400k, then got another 300k

How is that not a calling for a redistribution of wealth?

over the course of 6 years

yes, i think people should be limited in their power. do you disagree

he's dead ass broke

working a 15/hr job

they are

then i guess i want more limitation than you

they are limited in their competency to grow their power and keep it

"limited in their power" is just a side effect of your main goal being sticking it to people wealthier than you.

yeah because im actually liberal

i want liberty

it's not the way you're saying, "haah"

and freedom

that's a strawman

You're painting with a brush too broad Ix. Saying that people should have their power limited is not the same thing as what you've been arguing

"strawman":

that's what I mean to say

what?

lol

In other words, it's convenient for you that a wealthy person's power may be limited from having to give away more money

i'm not responsible for how you interpret me

If you're trying to communicate to us you are

no

If the limitation of power of individuals was so important for you, why did it take until now for you to bring it up?

not true

You brought up your loathing of the wealthy first and foremost.

i mean, Ix, you're basically no different than typical college tier liberals

?

you'll qoute marx

but then claim it's not marx

i never quoted marx

because you dont read marx

and dont know that it's literally marx

what did I say that quoted marx