without a permit you are disturbing the peace

@DrWittMDPhD urban dictionary word

@Cody "Let's imagine I'm the state of Ohio, of people want to make it illegal for mosques to play prayers, it gets challenged, goes to the scotus and then they decide that I cant legislate that"

Oh, not real

not a problem with the judicial, seems an issue with the congress

it seems like your law specifically respects an establishment of religion, prohibits its expression, and abridges the freedom of speech

@DrWittMDPhD it is real just not really real

Omg

Your an idiot

if you prohibit the expression, you have a problem

what you need is a noise ordinance

Firstly, a religion can not hamper another person in anyway

not a religious crackedown

@Cody let's not use idiot after "your"

Secondly, the example was just that

well, RFRA was passed by your favourite: elected officials.

An example

RFRA?

it is harder than ever to do anything respecting a specific religion

@Pyro Religious Freedom Restoration Act

ah

and I gave a real world example in which states did pass a local law that wasn't removed by the supreme court (and can't be). The new york law that says bathing with a duck is illegal

God dammit I met this rapper who was friends with lil peep and he keeps doing live streams on Instagram and wanting to talk about reptilians

Islam is a religion of fuck bitches get money

@Cody do you agree that it would be equally annoying if a church amplified sermons to be heard for blocks around, rather than mosques with prayers?

it's a real thing, is enforceable in new york

Look @xorgy the example was meant to display the scotus creating a law through the power of judicial review, whether it was just or not is irrelevant

well

the example fails to do that

It doesn't

because the scotus only has to look to the FIRST amendment

literally the first

You just dodged my point

before we did any other amendments to the constitution

the first

get it

FIRST AMENDMENT

that wasn't even scotus creating a law... that was the state trying to in your example @Cody scotus simply reviewed the law and found it to violate the constitution

You seem to think only written law is law

you're mad that the supreme court took your law which is obviously in contravention of the first amendment to the constitution, and said "hey, this looks to be contravening the constitution"

Calm down, fellas