Strict v implied

I'm a strict constitutionalist

no, you just have an incredibly strange interpretation of the constitution

It's not written down

So they have zero authority

I don't know what to say except that these are not arguments sustaining the notion that the supreme court is not entitled to decide questions concerning the constitutionality of acts of the United States

https://sites.google.com/a/ramapocentral.net/thomas-jefferson-lousiana-purchase/introduction/strict-vs-loose-interpretation

they don't have authority in any power sense really anyway, they are arbitrators not enforcers

u know how irritiating it is to change the constitution everytime some jackass does something that isnt stated in the constitution?

Even back then it was debated, sadly the loose assholes won

The Supreme Court has one power: answer questions as an authority on the constitution

Oh Avenatii...

The Supreme Court is the constitution

https://www.foxnews.com/us/woman-who-accused-avenatti-of-domestic-violence-files-restraining-order-court-records-show

But doesnt mean it's weird to want a smaller government

I like smaller government

He is always stirring something up or causing some bad press for himself.

Codes, do you have any written proof they were 'assholes' as you claim?

the Supreme Court is very small

such a good male feminist, believe all woman and all that BS

it only has nine people

yea its just biting him in the ass at this point

and one building

Or is that your unwritten interpertation?

Not small in terms of people

Small in terms of power

their sole power is to answer questions

@Malt_Hitman making me need to post a video from team america, lol

>believe all women
>says that his accuser is lying

the other branches can literally do whatever they'd like

the only power the supreme court has in that case is to browbeat them

the public knows more or less what the supreme court thinks about what the executive is doing

they can be like the loud annoying tattletale in the room as well 😉

and that's basically it

But checks and balances is not judicial review

...

You need to separate them

pretty sure that applies

so we're not allowed to ask the supreme court about the constitution?

They have the authority to rule on the people in Congress

Not on the laws that were pased