Message from @Pyro
Discord ID: 514317712353394708
and that is okay
because it is a rare oddity
and considerably better than some places
where the supreme court is held hostage by the military
Or we tell scotus that they dont have the ability to imply powers upon themselves
just go south if you want a weak supreme court
go way south
And we dont need to amend the constitution at all
basically everywhere in latin america, the supreme court has little power
so prohibition was fine?
isn't it great?
imagine if the supreme court couldn't refute the laws made by progressive democrats....
prohibition was constitutional
and immoral
which is why they amended the constitution again
to make it unconstitutional
and backfired
So when people are caught often stealing it becomes a crime to accuse them since they are a minority
they removed it because it failed spectaculary.... but mostly because prohibition cut their tax revenue
and you don't take money from a politician
well, sure
it was also expensive dealing with the bootleggers
they were getting rich and it was hard to profit off of that
also it was easy money for corrupt cops wanting to get rich
It's not stealing. It's borrowing without asking and no intent to return. Also, it's their 'culture'.
they had _far fewer_ resources as well
families like the kennedy's made a fortune out of bootlegging
they didn't have the DEA to chase down the bootleggers
yea chipotle was really trigger happy with firing her
yeah, I honestly don't understand these companies
so the very bootleggers BECAME the politicians
they are all cowards
by doing this hair-trigger firing
they end up having to pay more for labour
cause if it goes viral, people will boycott them
Just another comany run by lib morons fearing backlash.
they all are because theyre all scared shitless of becoming the target of an MSM witchhunt rather then giving a shit about wether or not any of it is valid or not.
to be fair chipotle is just subway for burritos
people will boycott them even if they capitulate