Likelihood seems to mostly be determined based on what people want to be true

In general that is

The 'likelyhood' that people would conspire seems to be pretty high given that humans are social animals.

See that is how I think @Malt_Hitman

It's odd to say otherwise but conspire needs to be defined

Working together in secret

Happens in every company

I thought it was that while women commit more acts of physical violence. Males tend to cause more serious physical injuries when they do commit those acts assuming no weapon in play (which then applies to both) and that these acts are usually reciprocal

That makes sense too @Misomania

that includes throwing stuff at people as well, such as bowls to the head

And if they are saying words can be violence then

Look out ladies

so while women lash out more often, those males repress and lash out more severely essentially

Men are, in general, stronger due to biology and have more muscle mass and testosterone.

Right

And social grooming to a lesser extent

Lesser effect rather

weapons don't care about muscle tone though. and a glass bowl thrown at one's head is still a weapon (and was used in an example I saw)

But I brought up that example to challenge the idea that 'likely' is somehow the same as guarenteed.

Weapons don't care. A weapon can help someone do more but you're still limited by who is using the weapon.

It's just that when I hear people use the phrase conspiracy theory, or use occams razor, they are essentially saying the perceived likely answer is actually proven

And that's fallacy

There's that other saying as well. "When you hear hooves think horses, not zebras." Because horses are more common than zebras it isn't a bad intuition but if you're somewhere where zebras are known to be, or more common than horses are, you should think zebras instead of horses.

r walmarts good or bad

People like to treat the familiar as being all around them, all the time.

Walmarts are absoulely terrible.

You should go on YouTube and look for those 'People of Walmart' videos.

wallmartians though? hilarious youtube fodder

That has nothing to do with Wal Mart

that is just people.

Those people would exist without wal mart.

Would they, though? Would they continue to exist if they couldn't shop at Walmart? I think not.

Yes, yes they would.

They existed in my home town long before Walmart showed up there.

The reason Walmart goers are worse is because of the low prices and having so much variety

And they're everywhere in the country

Those people would exist but they wouldn't all congregate in one place, so easily found

Ironically, most people mocked in People of Walmart are fat conservative women wearing clothes far too small

The ironic part is that we accuse liberal women of being proud to be fat more than republicans

Walmart is not a place of pride

Although I am assuming parties because of location