Not that

i wasnt responding to what you said

I wonder where the line is in heirachy where elitism becomes an issue

But labor to replace service

Nice idea

so, if you are female you have to breed a few babies for the government? Labor?

😉

Shut up <:GWlulurdMegaLul:402868018721456128>

Its funny how wed object to women being forced to have babies and possibly sex for the government when just 200 years ago thats what we did to men. Charged a bachelor tax and excluded bachelors from most jobs

But muh equality

Huh, im quite glad about feminixm, actualy

How

?

It is funny how much we've actually bent over to accommodate feminism.

becouse well they ended up freeing men. You cant not free men from the responsibility to women if you demand women get to make debts on their own for example

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

Whoa

@Redneo we've never objected to taking men and forcing them into their deaths during war though

true

we have a problem with creating life but never with ending it

muh body muh choice sweaty

in fact thats the first thing women voted for after "getting the vote" (and they didnt really get the vote, its not like women couldnt vote before 1920, it just wasnt federally mandated and a states issue)

Thing is Feminism is not about fighting for equality, but the power struggle of gaining as much power for females as possible, first wave feminism was about gaining power up to as much as men, but as it continues to exist in its current state it will keep going until stopped, or females have absolute power with a unanimous matriarchy

In the UK in fact, women could vote just as early as men could, they just had to pass the same requirements men did.

EXCEPT

of course

being draftable

service

Yeah

giving women the vote just gave them the ability to send men to their deaths without a choice on those dying, while giving those voting the control since they had nothing to risk

As always

People should be classical liberals in the regard of equality if equality is the actualy goal

I am against all inequality on opportunity level

I will not stand for equity on the outcome tho

I will state it, unless your risking your life in war then you never had business on voting for it

Equity is more of an authoritarian aspect

It is

it says

im just a hedonist and believe in terms of societal organisations it should be ethicly hedonist

voting just gives those without risk the ability to send people who had no choice to die in pointless wars

(and no, ethic hedonism is not hedonism and hedonism most likely isnt what you think if you hear the term)