He then wanted to put boots on the ground and got talked out of it
Do you have trouble following the news cycle?
anything to do with left wing people regarding weapons is a knee jerk reaction too then
in america
Depends on what they've said about it beforehand
No, but apparently you do beeman https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/04/11/world/middleeast/syria-military-us-russia-iran.html
He was talking about expanding to an Iraq or Afghanistan level force my dude
the US was definitely involved in Syria well before Trump
Soldiers on the ground with airstrikes providing support is an afghanistan level of force
going way back to when they built that airstrip in raqqa
>any amount of soldiers is the same amount of soldiers Okay
I saw that!
whats america doing in syria in the first place? seems like a proxy war, but that didnt start with trump. hardly a knee jerk reaction if you ask me
Just pointing out that your wording is lazy beeman
The US was not going to Afghanistan Syria under Trump, then Trump said they were going to, then he said he wouldnt
AHAHAHAHAHA
it started with the dual pipeline announcements
oh you're one of those "mission complete" guys
they didnt go the way the US wanted... and 2 weeks later "arab spring"
Que?
We never had any soldiers in afghanista after obama pulled em out right? he brought all the troops home yea?
I never said that
Who are you debating right now?
But we still do have soldiers in afghanistan
but when obama does it, its okay
:')
>we've now changed to an entirely different topic where my position has been fabricated wholesale
the options were to build a pipeline through Iraq, iran, syria out to sea ... or from Qatar, up through syria through turkey and then to europe
We can continue when you're finished being retarded
>my position has been discovered and shown to be ridiculous
the US and west in general wanted the Turkey route
Assad picked the Iran route
its ok, no one really cares that you think a world leader had a knee jerk reaction
pretty smart of assad turkey just wants to take a slice of Syria
>2000 troops = 140,000 troops
>no your position is ridiculous
Never mind the swings in public opinion and new information that prior to those decisions
>new information prior UN investigation teams weren't even in the country
You said boots on the ground and never specified an amount. You then said afghanistan levels of force without clarification and thats how the US effort in afghanistan started.
UN investigation teams? oh, those are the only people that can get information... i get it
turkey already has taken a large portion in the north west
