that seems

I only read the first sentence because it seems dumb. Why does he think that the universe being chaotic means it's not predictable?

Chaotic systems are in their very nature predictable.

freedom can't exist without non-freedom?

it's a false argument

why are we arguing this shit

i already said that free will and fate coexist

that's obviously true

How can you change the world if it is impossible to understand?

you can change it while being ignorant

easily

you just do something without knowing what will happen

How is that a willful action?

because you will it

willing something is wanting to do it and making it happen

you don't know what you want to do

you may have an idea

that idea may not be total

you may want to CUM

you end up rubbing your dick too hard

you end up fucking a rabbit

get more specific

monkey's paw

only three wishes

His argument is stupid. It for some reason conflates chaotic systems as being non-deterministic, and assumes that if one thing isn't deterministic then nothing is.

who

Mises

chaotic is non deterministic isn't it?

If causality does not exist, then you can't vonsciously cause anything to happen, so what use would free will be?

No

Chaotic is deterministic, but so complicated to appear as non-deterministic

free will is choice

no

choice is not about knowing what will happen when you choose it

Non deterministic is what mises meant by chaotic above.

But you can predict

people make mistakes when they make choices

ffs

Quite easily

the point is they have the freedom to make mistakes, that is free will.

fate can be called circumstance