Message from @woodchuck00
Discord ID: 521160659015303188
for moree detain on post glacial rebound you can read this:" https://sealevel.nasa.gov/data/dataset/?identifier=SLCP_Vertical_land_motion_in_ICE-6G_(VM5a)_ICE-6G_C_(VM5a)
@Misomania By the time we knew it was happening it would have already happened, we don't have FTL *anything* and we would need to have FTL sensors to spot it coming
The last paper UF sumited to the National Geologist Union said humans are responsible for 15% of golobal warming
It is actually a scenario that could potentially bring about some of the whole blood moon, blotting out the sun, wormwood stuff in revalations
Califonia wild fires put oun more C02 then humans trhis year and the number of fire have been going down
@woodchuck00 Got a link?
"he state is estimated to have released emissions equivalent to about 68 million tons of carbon dioxide, based on data analyzed by the U.S. Geological Survey. That’s close to the roughly 76 million tons of emissions produced by California’s electricity sector in all of 2016, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke said in a statement Friday. It equates to about 15 percent of all California emissions."
Seems limited to CA's emissions @woodchuck00
And only concerns power generation
Okay my bad there, but its still bad.
@woodchuck00 the paper you linked seems to concern rise from the disruption of thermohaline circulation rather than land ice melting.
they call it the ENSO factor: El Niño and La Niña
They are related, but isn't what most people mean when referring to sea level rise
the rain falls more on the ocean then it did in the past aparently.
@woodchuck00 I actually didn't realize that you could attribute localized sea level rise to these phenomena
Any of it
I tryed to help the CodersforMiami group toe create climate change awareness, they didn't like my idea, ending up going with a landing page with links and to intgigrate with wazs to navigate arounds floods.
The problem withere their idewas was waze is already aware of floods and natural disiasters.
But yeah, it isn't talking about the causal relationship that most people are referring to when we are talking about global sea level rise, which is the melting of glacial land ice.
The fact that it isn't caused by the gulf stream slowing is *good news* still
Also ***FUCK*** the day after tommorow
What the left and Democrats talk about is not what climate scientists and geologiest talk about.
the sciteists say we should build more nuclear but isn't envirementalist enough for them.
They would rather build solar, then turn on a desail generater at night.
that movie is mostly bullshit and colors the conversation about this specific topic whenever it is brought up
fucking hollywood
Curious what the chances are that humanity pulling water from aquifers all around the world an bringing it to the surface to evaporate an be rained down into the ocean is contributing to sea level rise. I'm not a scientist but it sounds like we're depleting quite a few aquifers around the world at a faster rate then they can refill
@shanepottermi We are, but most of the concern with that is land falling rather than it going to the sea
Very much a thing in CA
HIlariously so
Companies like Nestle bottling water and shipping around the world could be make big problems
some areas have already fallen more than 10 ft
my highscool was sinking into the ground liek an inch or 2 every year
if its not refilling these aquifers than its going somewhere.. lakes or the ocean. If 2/3rds of the surface area is ocean it would make sense that most of it is making its way to the oceans either from rain or lakes / rivers running into the ocean.
It is really interesting / annoying how CA seems to lead the entire environmental movement by the nose
Lots of activism around water conservation, which just isn't a big deal on the east coast
yeah in CA it must be really bad lol
Earth is 70% water but only 3% is freash, the water is freash water and most cities send rain water runoff to the ocean.
all those rich ppl watering theri lawns