@Misomania There is probably a lot more that they don't see

we're sitting in between 2 giant meteor belts

Space force baby

'well in our solar system at least'

imagine a pulstar

@shanepottermi You mean the lagrange points?

We have plenty of Trojans there

no one would've lived through a near miss of a chunk of a pulstar

houston gets fucking owned after every flood because theres nowhere for the water to hold anymore

@Misomania You mean gamma ray burst. Pulsars are a type of solar body

Yarp yarp @Ronald McFunkytown✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

used to have fields to soak up all the water... now those fields are nasty ugly subdivisions

@H3llbender the radiation that eminates from that end of a dying star, if mobile. Was listening to someone talk of rogue black holes and potential for dying stars to move that way

https://sealevel.nasa.gov/understanding-sea-level/causes/regional-sea-level-change

Still caused by global warming.

@H3llbender what would we be able to do against something like that? moving solar or rogue black holes... besides kiss our ass goodbye that is

for moree detain on post glacial rebound you can read this:" https://sealevel.nasa.gov/data/dataset/?identifier=SLCP_Vertical_land_motion_in_ICE-6G_(VM5a)_ICE-6G_C_(VM5a)

@Misomania By the time we knew it was happening it would have already happened, we don't have FTL *anything* and we would need to have FTL sensors to spot it coming

The last paper UF sumited to the National Geologist Union said humans are responsible for 15% of golobal warming

It is actually a scenario that could potentially bring about some of the whole blood moon, blotting out the sun, wormwood stuff in revalations

Califonia wild fires put oun more C02 then humans trhis year and the number of fire have been going down

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-03/california-fires-pumped-carbon-close-to-year-s-worth-of-power

@woodchuck00 Got a link?

"he state is estimated to have released emissions equivalent to about 68 million tons of carbon dioxide, based on data analyzed by the U.S. Geological Survey. That’s close to the roughly 76 million tons of emissions produced by California’s electricity sector in all of 2016, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke said in a statement Friday. It equates to about 15 percent of all California emissions."

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017GL073926

Seems limited to CA's emissions @woodchuck00

And only concerns power generation

Okay my bad there, but its still bad.

@woodchuck00 the paper you linked seems to concern rise from the disruption of thermohaline circulation rather than land ice melting.

they call it the ENSO factor: El Niño and La Niña

They are related, but isn't what most people mean when referring to sea level rise

the rain falls more on the ocean then it did in the past aparently.

@woodchuck00 I actually didn't realize that you could attribute localized sea level rise to these phenomena

Any of it

I tryed to help the CodersforMiami group toe create climate change awareness, they didn't like my idea, ending up going with a landing page with links and to intgigrate with wazs to navigate arounds floods.

The problem withere their idewas was waze is already aware of floods and natural disiasters.

The weirdest cause to me is Gravity’s fingerprints, don't really uinderstand it.

But yeah, it isn't talking about the causal relationship that most people are referring to when we are talking about global sea level rise, which is the melting of glacial land ice.

The fact that it isn't caused by the gulf stream slowing is *good news* still

Also ***FUCK*** the day after tommorow

What the left and Democrats talk about is not what climate scientists and geologiest talk about.
the sciteists say we should build more nuclear but isn't envirementalist enough for them.