Message from @Brant

Discord ID: 521590486771826689


2018-12-10 07:32:34 UTC  

*shrugs* try coming up with a better argument, and stop throwing a tantrum when people dont automatically believe your current one.

2018-12-10 07:32:36 UTC  

no, my point is that the reason they say the building fell was due to jet fuel burning the spine

2018-12-10 07:32:43 UTC  

brant, you don't understand Witt

2018-12-10 07:32:47 UTC  

anyway

2018-12-10 07:33:01 UTC  

if the spine was the reason, and jet fuel is the reason, it doesn't add up

2018-12-10 07:33:03 UTC  

lol this is every debate i ever had about it

2018-12-10 07:33:08 UTC  

the entire building fell and there was no spine left

2018-12-10 07:33:12 UTC  

ergo it was demolished

2018-12-10 07:33:22 UTC  

Jetfuel doesn't need to "burn" or "melt" a steel beam to make a building collapse btw

2018-12-10 07:33:23 UTC  

if it simply fell due to weight, there would still be a spine

2018-12-10 07:33:31 UTC  

there would still be a spine

2018-12-10 07:33:36 UTC  

nothing was left

2018-12-10 07:33:41 UTC  

MTOW of a B-25 H was 15,910 kg , still a huge difference between the two, cant find data on how much fuel they carried.

2018-12-10 07:33:45 UTC  

people also said they heard explosions from the basement

2018-12-10 07:33:55 UTC  

nothing matches up with the official take of events

2018-12-10 07:33:58 UTC  

this is old news

2018-12-10 07:34:02 UTC  

It could have been broken apart from the fall impact tho @Gilgamesh

2018-12-10 07:34:08 UTC  

But yes

2018-12-10 07:34:11 UTC  

standard 767 carries 16,700 US gallons (64,217 litres)

2018-12-10 07:34:18 UTC  

The basement thing is sus

2018-12-10 07:34:22 UTC  

somehow doubt that a B-25 would have had the same amount of fuel as well

2018-12-10 07:34:23 UTC  

the spine would stand if the floors around it fell. it was designed to do so

2018-12-10 07:34:30 UTC  

"it cant work"
"it definitely can work because it did"
"you dont have a degree"
"not an argument"

2018-12-10 07:35:03 UTC  

we haven't even gotten into who did it

2018-12-10 07:35:13 UTC  

The force of the entire building smacking on the spine as it falls down can break it.

2018-12-10 07:35:14 UTC  

most people accept it was not as it was said

2018-12-10 07:35:18 UTC  

the argument tends to be who did it

2018-12-10 07:35:23 UTC  

klingons, no doubt, if you dont believe it was the klingons you're clearly either a fool or an agent for them .. ;P

2018-12-10 07:35:28 UTC  

it was the jews /s

2018-12-10 07:35:51 UTC  

Yeah Ix is gonna star talking about Mossad funding in 5 seconds

2018-12-10 07:36:01 UTC  

witt, the spine supports the floors. it was designed that if a floor collapsed that it would only fall so far, so that the spine could stand for the rest of the floors that haven't been damaged

2018-12-10 07:36:24 UTC  

the plane went straight into the building like butter

2018-12-10 07:36:30 UTC  

then all of a sudden it collapsed all at once

2018-12-10 07:36:36 UTC  

and you have firefighters saying they hear explosions

2018-12-10 07:36:55 UTC  

then jet fuel burns 1000 degrees too cool to even melt the fucking steel

2018-12-10 07:36:58 UTC  

yet the building falls straight down

2018-12-10 07:37:04 UTC  

i hope you're all enjoying the convo

2018-12-10 07:37:06 UTC  

even if it was weakened, it would have fallen sideways

2018-12-10 07:37:06 UTC  

You don't have to melt the steal dude

2018-12-10 07:37:16 UTC  

ffs

2018-12-10 07:37:27 UTC  

this is where logic is bested by vested interests