Message from @shanepottermi

Discord ID: 521835239387955220


2018-12-10 23:44:19 UTC  

it is a problem

2018-12-10 23:44:40 UTC  

people on the left seem to want a dystopian authoratarian future where they are afraid to say anything at all

2018-12-10 23:44:56 UTC  

Dysoypian

2018-12-10 23:45:01 UTC  

china's pretty good at protect peoples freedom from harmful opinions

2018-12-10 23:45:05 UTC  

for freedom!

2018-12-10 23:45:12 UTC  

I think it is wonderful that the big platforms choose to sensor
their MySpace moment is coming

2018-12-10 23:45:12 UTC  

I heard Tim say it before, Section 230 of the US communications decency act gives big tech power. I remember hearing from Tim that Twitter argued in court they could deny service to anyone, even based on other reasons like race/gender? Am I remembering that right?

2018-12-10 23:45:42 UTC  

CDA s230 grants legal immunity to "neutral platforms"

2018-12-10 23:45:56 UTC  

@Nomad under safe harbour they forfeited that right to gain immunity from lawsuits

2018-12-10 23:46:08 UTC  

They aren't neurtral

2018-12-10 23:46:12 UTC  

but USMCA rewrote CDA s230 with no neutral platform requiremnet

2018-12-10 23:46:19 UTC  

oh well

2018-12-10 23:46:21 UTC  

so now they are coming out as not neutral

2018-12-10 23:46:23 UTC  

fuck us all then.

2018-12-10 23:46:38 UTC  

and any intelligent observer has recognized the platforms were not neutral for some time

2018-12-10 23:46:44 UTC  

well

2018-12-10 23:46:47 UTC  

Well yes.

2018-12-10 23:46:49 UTC  

and twitter itself, with a federal judge, got it ruled that anyone not being able to post on trump's twitter page is a violation of the 1st ammendent

2018-12-10 23:46:51 UTC  

yes and no

2018-12-10 23:46:56 UTC  

like that imam who wants to stop radical islamic terrorists.. if someone has a wild out of control beard.. they might be a terrorist since trimming your beard is bad in islam

2018-12-10 23:47:11 UTC  

it is good that big tech is exposing itself

2018-12-10 23:47:14 UTC  

really good

2018-12-10 23:47:30 UTC  

so twitter itself called banning people from twitter illegal

2018-12-10 23:47:47 UTC  

apple: "our values guide our curation decisions"
every clueful person: "no shit, tim"

2018-12-10 23:47:51 UTC  

yet nothing is done about it because no one seems to have any spine

2018-12-10 23:48:51 UTC  

done... in what sense?

2018-12-10 23:49:35 UTC  

so under twitter's own guide, from the hand of a leftist activist judge, it ruled that they cannot ban people from twitter because donald trump's twitter page is a town square and covered under 1st amendment

2018-12-10 23:49:52 UTC  

But that won't ever be applied fairly Misomania

2018-12-10 23:50:00 UTC  

removed trump's abilty to block people as well under it

2018-12-10 23:50:23 UTC  

if any page on twitter is 1st amendment, they all are

2018-12-10 23:50:33 UTC  

those cases will eventually hit the supreme court

2018-12-10 23:50:52 UTC  

and the court has indicated a willingness to consider some forums to be the public square

2018-12-10 23:50:53 UTC  

and it won't matter.

2018-12-10 23:51:00 UTC  

so maybe some people will be able to sue

2018-12-10 23:51:02 UTC  

because shit like this only is held up for the left wing.

2018-12-10 23:51:03 UTC  

that means that no one can be banned or blocked from twitter, under twitter's own legal victory

2018-12-10 23:51:05 UTC  

but it's not a real solution

2018-12-10 23:51:20 UTC  

i believe they're just claiming gov officials twitter since its communicating gov statements

2018-12-10 23:51:43 UTC  

twitter may be in a poor position to delete or deny accounts

2018-12-10 23:51:46 UTC  

we'll see