@EndangeredProdigy Because of the companies

Lol

what?

It has made are quality of life go up

if it wasn't then there would be a single company that owns all food production. And they would have total control of it all

Live in a society without trade for me

I believe in trade

I don't know what you are implying here

@EndangeredProdigy thats their choice. and why they have to worry about food control.

We wouldnt have apple without steve jobs or microsoft without bill gates

I have a degree in Business Admin and Finance lol why would I have done that if I didn't believe in trade

and trade enables anything more complex then what you can make yourself

There are failure modes in capitalist systems. You have to study them as a part of any economics degree.

@EndangeredProdigy Well companies arent free to trade with who they want

without trade, then you wouldn't have anything you cannot make

yes they are

Cartels, collusion, regulatory capture, monopoly, monopsony, etc.

@Misomania Exactly

as long as there aren't embargoes on the countries

The individuals have brought us so much

@Existence is identity why exactly? that goes against your stance

But you want to violate their rights

If you are a strict NAP ancap, these failure modes have no recourse.

Lmao, NAP ancaps.

Trade with me or im gonna use government and put a gun to your head

what rights are you talking about here

we'd be in farms living in huts without trade

Just be anarcho-primitives.

rights are a very broad statement

Property and freedom of association

@Existence is identity your stance calls for another dark ages essentially

Strict NAP ancaps see these as normal. But they lead to tyranny just as bad or worse than any totalitarian government.

no no no

they just purged mumkeys new channels

two channels

they can associate with who they want as long as the people they are associating with aren't criminals

don't be anarcho primatives

predictable.

become amish

i think one channel didnt even have anything on it

or menonite