you just change the constitution

It ain’t that simple

yeah it is 😉

People wouldn’t want to change the 1st amendment just to regulate big tech when there are free market solutions

1A has nothing to do with big tech

postmodernism fixed the constitution problem, there are no facts, only interpretations.

^

facts don't matter, only "personal truth"

I see things MY way, hence i'm correct

The whole reason they’re allowed to ban people indiscriminately is 1A protection

They aren’t a government entity so the government can’t tell them what content they must allow

1A applies only to the government, not non-government entities (such as companies/corporations/people)

They can ban people indiscriminately because their servers are their property, hippity hoppity.

social media isn't considered a public platform by law

Exactly my point

so how does that negatively impact companies?

I never said it did

Seize the means of discussion! Only communism can protect us from the commies! <:commie:463087263153258506>

so why would they wanna change the constitution?

they have it the way they want it

I never said they did, @halfthink did

not really

constitution is a spook

I think they’re perfectly fine with the way things are currently

***there is only natural law***

***so to speak***

There’s no law without enforcement

State capitalism is an oxymoron

You’re an ancap I take it?

Private property does not exist if the government maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of force.

State liberty is an oxymoron,

State capitalism is a perfectly acceptable term

In the US the government doesn’t have a monopoly on the legitimate use of force , that’s the point of the 2A

so naive

Can you own a tank?

yes

Yes lol

not nukes though

Can anyone?

but you can own a tank in the US

Mr beast has one

Functional?