No, it's quite shit.

Usually conservatives point to defending against a tyrannical gov't and arguments like that

It will not convince a single person that needs convincing.

I mean, you can sacrifice your guns if you want. But I'll shoot ya

```It will not convince a single person that needs convincing.
```

there's also the evidence that being heavily armed prevents foreign invasion. That's usually my go-to argument

Penn and Teller did it better.

The 2nd amendment was not made for anything nice

Do you think we're at the point where people can actually be convinced?

The 2nd amendment is for a future VIOLENT BLOODY TAKEOVER OF YOUR OWN CORRUPT GOVERNMENT

I think we passed it a year ago and didn't realize until right about now

Having a population that is comfortable with guns also is very beneficial when it comes to Draft time. They already are trained with how to shoot

Lead with that. An actual, true argument.

Because "I like guns fuck off" doesn't cut it.

It's mongoloid cro magnon waterhead retarded idiot fuckwad cavespeak.

Holy shit, stop losing me my rights by being that stupid.

Yeah but when I use the "we need guns to prevent violent takeover by authoritarians" I get the "lmao you can't kill a tank with an AR you fuckin dumbass"

Stop being stupid, I want to keep my rights.

Kill yourself if you're going to be that stupid.

**Kill yourself.**

bruh moment

Wow

```"lmao you can't kill a tank with an AR you fuckin dumbass"```
Who thought 2nd amendment means guns?

It means all weapons you can procure.

@Copernicus I'd point to the prevention by the Swiss in WWII

Well I think it also includes tactical nuclear devices, but I'm in a small minority

I hope I can meet a woman like Miss Scribblehatch someday

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo9Vu_X6lKw

If you guys wonder how you fight back against your government.

Well.

Stop wondering that.

There's more of us than there are of them.

That's how.

They have drones and shit, son

Nukes are interesting. There's an assumption that one nuke would cause another nuke to be launched in retaliation. I don't think that's true, though. If the USA was nuked by North Korea, the USA would not launch a nuke back. We'd just go and fuck them up

Doesn't even account for guerilla warfare. We have a lot of wilderness in the contintental US

```They have drones and shit, son
```
Are you ignoring the video I've posted.

The only reason the Killdozer got so far was because an air strike was denied

Yeah, we can barely beat Middle Eastern insurgents with drones.

You think every single citizen will be taking on the exact same strategy?

I can't imagine the horror of trying to fight American citizens on American soil.