Message from @Lord Inquisitor H.J. Fleischmann
Discord ID: 527618917276057631
If I recall, I nearly got banned for asking a question.
its a fine line between moderation and censorship, but some people are just annoying to be around.
Its all about context.
I'm against censorship
All
Well, CP should get yeeted imo
Perhaps
Ah no, it was my profile picture that nearly got me banned.
There are times that you do have to remove someone, or silence them. It should be a last resort though.
I'm not for banning, I'll just block
And fyi I have 0 ppl blocked
I think tim said it best when joo was banned.
If you set of a place for people to talk about subject X, and people always try to turn that into a way to talk about Y, they are being distruptive.
I have so many furries blocked dude. They post so much porn constantly.
Still, if they broke the rules in an egregious manner they ought to be banned
@Coochie coo - he went way too far for anyone to let him stay. I got sick because of how toxic he was to me
I have crossed paths with so many annoying furries...
Furries should always be banned
*always*
people who use the word toxic, are usually the most toxic people.
From Joo @AHeroQuest ?
They are.
'Always' is an absolute statement....
GPT
man that dude has some problems
I guess I put ppl back in their place, I dont have a problem getting crazy myself
That would make you what I was accused of.
Ah yes GPT, I did block him however @AHeroQuest
Now the lies come out
But bann, I have mixed feelings
zero people blocked
He callled me a liar when I said I was bisexual
Derailing conversations or talking about jews is not against the rules, by my understanding.
what else have you been feeding us
Temp block
It's obnoxious, but not against the rules laid out.
Is your name really even Pussy?
"2. No race-baiting, racism, or other racially charged attacks"
I don't know you anymore
He was spamming my DM
Talking about races is not racism or race-baiting except by ludicrously strict definitions of the terms.