if we were really able to take over the world with no difficulty, why haven't we done it yet

ya nuclear bombs, whst do we create oh ya proxy wars

the western alliance and even russia both work together for proxy wars

it's like everyone in the room negoiating is holding a live grenade with the pin pulled out as the default tactic

of course we don't take over the world yet

our fucking propaganda relies on people thinking we aren't power hungry

we have to come up with excuses

we create our own fucking enemies

we have always created terrorist organizations

the governments can't overpower the citizens

why the fuck not

they do it already

because there are too many

with propaganda

media control

they divide and conquer

why are our two parties so different but we always tend to agree on foreign policy

@Gilgameshholy shit the world is 1984!!!

and when we don't agree on foreign policy there is a sudden attack that makes us all suddenly agree

pearl harbor, 9/11

that is the social credit score @Archon

it'll happen anyway

you forgot every iraq

and vietnam

and WW1

and WW2

this is what the war industrial complex means

we have faked problems to go to war

constantly

I will agree with that

but that is because our economy relies on war

so we're bitching about taxes and debt

meanwhile it doesn't really fucking matter

we went to war and took over 4 countries to save like 5 cents on banannas for dole

the cold war is why we rely on war

the cold war lol

I would say WW2 is why we rely on war

the bananna wars were real

no

we spent soo many years building up our MIC that it is "too big to fail"

@Misomania ya China, Europe and USA in line for it ugh USA via tech companies of course