it's easier to control people who are divided @BlueAndBlack

People give Trump shit for immigration, Obama deported a shitload more people <:NPC:500042527231967262>

Democrats were trying a power grab, to take control of United States and maintain the illusion of free elections with the use of Media.

Like the EU does.

Looks more like the soviet union and Kremlin fucked them up hard and instead of admitting Marxist subversion is actually a great tool for destruction they pretended they did it

They wanted to create a EU like state between United States, Canada, and Mexico.

@EndangeredProdigy if you're in power, a unified nation is easier. It's only easier if you're not in power, ie being a vanguard for a revolution.

The EU was a stupid idea. "hey let's share government with these socialist countries"

Jesus

Look it up.

The problem is that the nation doesn't want what those in power do @BlueAndBlack

so to counter that they divide us

Uh, ha, what?

The plan was to get rid of borders, create a Tri-State between Mexico, United States, and Canada like the EU State.

The general population of the United States does not want what the political elite in this country do @BlueAndBlack

You can see the planning inside the Wikileaks.

Oh, also the new president of Mexico is a socialist, imagine if Clington was in power

Nah, you're talking about something separate, the reason the banks/financial institutions jumped on the cultural Marxist bandwagon is to sell credit cards and loan programs to the Indian middle class

Hillary supported this idea. Basically giving away United States Sovereignty.

That's a big oof

The cultural Marxism/post modernism stuff happened long, long before this was a feasible idea

Those damn Indians and their curry funding marxist banks lol

(although for reasons I place the starting period at 1990)

You know... if Hillary and Globalist had their way. Native Americans would be extinct.

Erik Satie wrote furniture music back in the 20s

Because they would loose all protection, they would be chased off their land.

Socialism has never and will never be viable when your system literally wants equality of outcome

I think it was Dupont made a toilet a sculpture in the 30s

Yeah equity is cancer

Most creatives fall for it for some weird reason

It's not if you're a complete loser that doesn't want to improve their conditions

Do people actually believe in a system that would literally try to take their riches away to give them to someone else?

If you're a loser who sucks at art, the hint you could still be a famous great artist by producing literal shit out of your ass is a very inviting opportunity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union

This is what would happen if Hillary won, that is what they would have aimed for.

@The Server Oven, LUwU2 only the middle class

Yeah, there's something about the creative mindset that falls for marxist rhetoric

United States borders would be obsolete and anyone could travel into United States.

20% of the music industry identifies as marxist

No.... There's something about the failed artist, someone who studies Bach is as bourgeoisie as you can get