things like a talking dog that bangs supermodels or a reincarning child are not reality

that is the same I think in using a cartoon bear to discuss the same topics

the bear isn't affecting the message in the least

what the video relied on was tucker carlson

with the brief asides by the narrator

the same reason why stewie is allowed to rag on something, is the same function that a cartoon bear uses talking about similar topic

yet both are possible with live action or a disembodied voice minus a cartoon avatar

consider the daily show with jon stewart

but the live action... would the reception be the same? (doubt it myself)

do you need a cartoon avatar to receive a message?

Depends on how creative the creators are

Who killed Roger rabbit is a perfect example of a nonsensical universe being shown through (mostly) live action

i think you're being too down on yourself if you think the foudation of your reception of a political message is only viable thru a cartoon/animation medium

Who's making that case here though

miso

nope, stated as a whole that the collective reception of an idea is greatly impacted by the visualation of the presentor

right

that's uncontested

it's the degree of impact that's debatable

but overall it seems that with live people we as a whole are more confrontational and skeptical... whereas with cartoon avatars it's more laid back but also more dismissive

personally, I run videos mostly off screen and rarely look at them

so again, we're back to the medium of delivery

but if you read the comments of the cartoon bear video and the live person you'll see the idea in action

usually in the cartoon bear video comments, there is more discussion on the idea.. whereas people get more based on...well, the people in the video

what I cannot stand is the robot voice auto reader

that's not a quantifiable argument

the assertion that the argument will naturally be drowned out by the performance/image of the narrator is something of an opinion

it's something I see fairly often to notice that pattern

perhaps you can refer to the nixon/kennedy debate

that'll bolster your position

though i argue that it is the body language impact of live action debates which greatly impact one's message

and it's one I know I do all the time.... have the same idea come from a guy or a hot woman and see who I listen to

after all, it is shown that body language account's for roughly 80% of a conversation

I think that gravitating to certain speakers based on their physical appearance is a base impuse buried deep in our lizard brain

so the only way then to disable that part of the brain is to remove the speaker?

maybe

but that's a difficult hypothesis to test

the cartoon bear 😃

SO ANGRY

lol

lol