@Undead Mockingbird maybe.. kind of the mindset that if someone comes at me I need to stand my ground and defend myself more though... if it was just being rude I'd move away but actual violence directed at me is something different

What do people think about the causes?

The bombs happen mostly in central locations and most marginal places are pretty much peaceful

taking away the fact that most guerrillas control big sectors

Well that depends on the propaganda

Most people in marginal areas believe is US fault

@Misomania I just don't like the language media use, "causing a divide". Saying true things can cause a divide. That shouldn't put the onus on you if you refuse to lie.

but thats due to guerrilla propaganda

Still its a shithole

wouldnt dare to go there

how are divides bad if the two sides can respect each other and debate though? that is another thing the media cannot grasp.. why are people not allowed to think different or come to different conclusions?

also dont think of it as ruins

think of it as a modern city and modern villages

the problem being that the left (as authoratarians) cannot tolerate dissent from their opinion

most people even use normal clothes

People should be able to do that actually. Have different opinions, and still be able to get along while discussing issues in a civil manner. Is that the case though?

i think the MW there is arround 1200 right now

but life is expensive as fuck

Yes.

That's why I don't like coded language.

Yeah Wally i have been watching the whole debacle since 2010

"Causing a divide".

What does that even mean?

Im pretty confident to say that the media and Hillary caused the divide

and Trump didnt helped it

It's all these vague innuendo people use, against people like Stefan Molyneux, too.

@Undead Mockingbird literally just means you have a different opinion from theirs, and that is the problem in their eyes

I just read his Wikipedia article and it's a train wreck.

Well, the media actually played a big part in it, by taking and focusing on the negatives in all instances, especially during the 2016 campaign.

"causing a divide" is a friendlier way of saying "we cannot believe they disagree with our correct opinions"

Yeah that was a circus

God i actually feeled pity for you

picking between a psycho and a clown

Everything in his article is about what other people say about him. It's not if he's right or not. It's what people FEEL in response. Same with all the other coded language.

What we live under is really a tyranny of feelings.

and btw... pissing off snowflakes is fucking brilliant as a debate strategy on so many levels

The way I see it when I say *divide* is people who are so far ideologically apart that they have a harder time reacing a middle ground between both sides.

I don't see it as people "having different opinions than me"

Well and who is to blame? The right havent change at all

If enough people feel bad about what I say, I can be locked away in many countries.

they are still the same conservative fucktards of 2010