Even if someone had hacked the DNC, does anybody even question if that is election meddling?

I'm not doubting that 9/11 happened, I'm doubting what the official story is

Somehow the fucking majority of the plane is vaporized but the passports are perfectly in tact?

That's the most damning evidence

So Fuck off

Did it change the outcome of the vote? If it did, should it have? If facts have been exposed that made the DNC look bad, especially if coming from their own servers, would it not have been proper for the public to have a bad opinion based on it?

this is why I hate people blatantly against any openminded critical thinking

How is that "election hacking"?

meanwhile both sides of the left and right openly engage in conspiracy theory

without calling it that

the left are all conspiracy theorists with the Russia collusion shit

Even if every letter of the report was true, even then I would not have been convinced that anything has happened that should not have.

What is a conspiracy theory?

What does that term even mean?

ah yes the magic passport, someone just finds it among millions of office paper fragments on the street, pretty bizarre

Conspiracy is people working together in secret against others

ergo it's common as fuck

It seems like a completely vapid term, yes.

@Gilgamesh If someone burns down your house, do you stop to ask if they used kerosene? Dont get bogged down on the details, theirs alot of evidence to point to ((( who did it )))

It communicates close to nothing.

Jock you seem to be going back and forth and I'm lost

but yeah it is a buzzword like some double speak shit

He's a bullshitter.

@Crimsom The big story was Crowdstrike conviced the FBI the DNC servers were hacked. But when they walked back the evidence they noted that the FBI and "other intelligence" agencies had concluded it was Russians. But this was circular logic since the FBI was going by Crowstike's evidence that was now non existent. Also there was another account that claimed the amount of data stolen could not have been transmitted over the internet in the time allowed that it was most likely removed via a usb device. I'll look for that one.

There is far more evidence that there was an internal leaker.

that was ray mcgovern and veterans for peace, right?

Julian Assange had strongly hinted towards it at one piont.

@Crimsom https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

I had made a transcript of that video.

the network timing stuff

I remember when the democrats said the FBI and CIA weren't to be trusted

during the GW Bush era

amazing how short people's memories are

now because the FBI is against Trump, they're acting like anything they say is absolute fact

we're a little fucked

@Crimsom And remember there was a lot of Bernie supporters working at the DNC that were pissed when they found out that the DNC had colluded with Hillary to make sure she was the nominee. One might have been a guy named Seth Rich who was murdered during a robbery from which nothing was stolen.

fbi with their shady sting operations, grooming the same terrorists that they take credit for stopping and patting themselves on the back

plus we're all aware that the CIA assassinated a democratically elected official in the (60's?)

which has become public knowledge through the freedom of information act

i'm just a little baffled how the democrats threw out all that they had for logic and retention

just because some guy said "grab her by the pussy"'