I love how he writes "So, under the eugenics program, government officials here in the United States engaged in the involuntary sterilization of people who they considered to be imperfect, with the goal of making sure that they didn’t produce imperfect children. According to Wikipedia, the imperfect people included people with mental and physical disabilities, people with low IQs, criminals, deviants, and members of disfavored minority groups."

minimum wage is so cancer, it hurts to see it all the time.

>According to Wikipedia

But that is not true. Labor, as any other service or good, will reach an equilibrium determined by supply and demand.

minimum wage wouldnt exist if were not for immigration

This guy's just cherry picking bullshit. He's not explaining facisim and socialisim as a philosophy or an ecenomics system with citations

how trully interesting

there is no work avaliable to everyone even if by some miracle you teach 100% to use a computer

cause a problem and make a law for the problem

The best explanation of fascism has been done by Friedrich Hayek.

this is a MUST watch, imo. as good as it comes, the finest e-journalism. https://youtu.be/0wlNey9t7hQ watch this - to anyone who hasn't

Oh look your group is funded by the Koch brothers. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Future_of_Freedom_Foundation

Fucking what

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Foundation_for_Economic_Education

Mises...

are you trolling? I can't tell

do you want a mom and pop funded blog research instead?

all i've seen this weeb do is being a contrarian and calling other people spergs and niggers

soooo

Here's an air quote image for y'all

And they tried to hide the fact they were Koch funded. ohhh tisk tisk

🤣

Technically it wasn't just the cock brothers

Mises is one of the most famous economists of the 20th century.

Mises and Hayek, what a misfortune it is to ignore these men.

Famous=/= Good

Rockefellers, the Carnegie foundation

Yeah but why obscure that fact. At least CATO is up front about it

But is DragonBallzzzz saying being on wiki somehow disproves something?

Man you guys love these ghetto ass sources

Huh.

The truth is uncomfortable, isn't it? Oh we know.

You clearly don't know who sourcewatch is

you start to love the bitter nature of it all. 🤔

"If it's on wikipedia, it must not be true"

- every teacher

i mean you can check the sources if you have debouts

You can go through their 990 if they claim to be not-for profit to verify everything