I just said it's not solid

which explains why stars have been observed through the moon

documented since 1700s. even by royal academy of science

also explains why....in 2019...we still don't have on the moon:

Rovers

Cameras

Telescopes

LUnar bases

Hotels

How do you know that its not solid?

Also I believe that the reason why we didn't go back to the moon is because something already occupies it

we never went

I believe we did

Multiple times

based on what data?

And I fail to find anyone who can change my mind

that hasn't been exposed as fraud ad nauseum

nobody can change your mind

only you can do that

Based on costs of how much it would be to just fake it and basic common sense.

costs?

lol

It'd cost more to replicate the moonlanding than to actually just do it.

on what are you basing that claim?

the budget for the full length film Gravity was only $100 Million

Proven by Adam Conover.

the comedian/actor?!!?!?

lol

nice try

All the data they use is real

Sure he;s an actor and comedian

Doesn't mean the data's fake.

OK 🙂

One of the largest points made was how the shadows within the apollo 11 mission being the result of parallel sunrays with no diffusion.

The only way this could be recreated is with millions of super light lasers

Something that was ridiculously expensive to obtain in 1969

Not to mention the only colour they came in was red

Which we clearly don't see in the recording.

shadows are not parallel in the moon photos