@Sassy Undeniably show me evidence else bye

dont be surprised if u notice some changes or ur devices

You'd have to prove the moon landing was real in the first place

I just showed you evidence you dismiss it for no reason

they collecting data and are sending it to a newly made agency

wasn't talking to you and you first

and we have

At least the first official one they claimed to be real

@IXI I explained what happened

They could conceiveably have had the money to go back but they spent a fair share of it on the construction of the ISS

evidence can be debunked

astronots to the moon not

Your explanation is invalid and makes no sense

I am sorry that your illiterate

we went to the moon

There is plenty of evidence

^

oh and they are so smart the destroyed all the evidence that got them there and oh yeah we can't go back because we have never been

In fact, rocks we brought back helped support the Giant Impact Hypothesis

various other nations have photographed the apollo sites

your delusional @Sassy Undeniably

no sorry

What giant impact

The rocks are proven to be from earth

Petrified wood

Everyone saw the Saturn 5 locket launch lol

There are warehouses full of blueprints for various space shuttles

How can that be faked

@IXI how stupid do you think NASA is?

What ever happened to the technology they used to get to the moon the first time? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_sazQnHKTM

Very stupid

It would be harder to fake a Moon landing than actually going to the Moon

400,000 people worked for the first moon landing, so how come nobody has spoken out about

it

@floridaswamptrash I just explained that

@Chief Rocket Designer Go ahead dude

I'll entertain your explanation

@floridaswamptrash The Apollo Space craft requires infrastructure to launch, IBM computers from that era, and all the right materials in the right order will billions of dollars to build this infrastructure let alone the rocket itself. NASA right now is basically the lead of the ISS When it comes to sustaining that platform, we also have a ton of infrastructure and mission probes which also cost millios of dollars. In 1970-1980 we replaced the Apollo Hardware with the updated space shuttle hardware, the space shuttle was mean't to go to LEO only so not the moon. Going back to apollo would not be worth it because we can do everything cheaper with new materials now? Why are we not doing this you ask? We are, but slowly, NASA is preparing for the first launch of the SLS within a year or two I think so. We are going back. However we don't have the 50 billion dollars (adj) we had in 1969. We have about 19 Billion today. So we are doing more than we did in those eras internationally and in deep space and still trying to go to the moon with less money. We did not "destroy" that technology we removed the ability to use it because we replaced it. In the same way you replace your phone, you don't destroy your phone you replace it. That does not mean that your phone has backward compatailty. It does not mean that you should get an older phone when you can just wait and get a better phone.

It is reality that it never happened and you ignore the fact that they have said they never went so you can keep fantasizing and hypothesizing all the while maintaining your delusions. Keep the name calling out of it and attack the info not me because you don't want me to put my sassy pants on.

That’s not it

Or maybe that’s part of it too, but mostly