*Partially quoting Einstein*
Einstein said there is no such thing as a gravitational force. Mass is not attracting mass over a distance. Instead, it’s curving spacetime. If there is no force, then how do you explain acceleration due to gravity? Objects should accelerate only when acted upon by a force; otherwise they should maintain a constant velocity.

Ever heard of CGI.

Lmao

I'm guessing everyone just brushed over my question

CGI can do this

So explain to me why CGI can't make one globe planet?

That looks pretty realistic right there.

And NASA has **Billions**

You underestimate their fakery.

So about things falling

Why at different rates

Based on location?

Buoyancy.

Farther from the sea and higher up.

Even in a vacuum?

Fake NASA vaccuum.

No

Ok so you expect objects to float in a vaccuum?

Nope

But they should fall, right?

you just trust everything they tell you

If they falls as an irreducible quirk of the universe

It should be a constant rate, right?

9.8 m/s^2

I'm talking from the perspective of someone who has done acceleration measurements

<@657953077655240704> nice

@🎃Oakheart🎃 so why do they fall in a near vacuum?

I'm guessing you assume I am lying?

No

I'm just saying its fake.

And physics class = fake as well.

Obv they're going to teach you shit to make you think its a globe.

Hang on

And equations set up to fit a globe model.

So why do things fall in a near vacuum?

Of course the equations are going to fucking work, because they've been designed to fit a globe!

Buoyancy.

So the same object should fall at the same rate in a vacuum, right?

@🎃Oakheart🎃 still thete?

There*