@ProgrammerVerbatim did u see the finale last night?

finale for what?

If you don’t support the 2nd law argument, then why are you claiming the atmosphere should disperse into space?

mr robot

its the tv show ur profile picture is from

@Fran take it to <#484514023698726912>

@Fran oh i was freaked on how you knew i watch mr robot lol

lmao

because i think it would

It doesn’t though

We can observe this

same reson i think nebula would disperse

Why? Gas dispersing into an equilibrium is part of the 2nd law of thermodynamics

i dont claim space couldnt exist because of it

Particles in a nebula attract each other the same as any celestial body

that is the 2nd law of thermodynamics argument

You claim that the atmosphere couldn’t exist though? I’m confused

as i understand it

The argument isn’t that space can’t exist though

it is

Ok, I am going to be straight with you. Fluid dynamic is not my strong suit

Space is obviously far more vast, the argument is that the atmosphere would disperse into space

Now you’re just changing labeling

If you want to argue about geometry I would be more comfortable with that

no

Me pop knows a lot about fluid dynamics, not that it matters

copy pasta to prove label changing

You know who I miss?

Indio.

That guy was so fun to argue with

he's on 24/7

Oh

Well he doesn’t say much

he does as far as i know

hes very knowledgeable

It’s not a matter of copy pasta. Space would still exist if the atmosphere dispersed into space. Flat Earthers using the 2nd law of therm argument claim gas pressure can’t exist if space does

Which is exactly what you’re claiming

i believe that if space were as we are told then the air would disperse

Yes, that’s the 2nd law of thermodynamics argument

same as it would for a nebula

no