Yes, that’s the 2nd law of thermodynamics argument

same as it would for a nebula

no

they say space cannot exist

What is the 2nd law argument, can you clarify?

Why do they say it cannot exist?

because it violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics

Why does space’s existence supposedly violate the law in the argument?

i am not talking such a rigid position

i just give an opinion

But you’re using the exact same argument

@California Nightmare 3.0 unmote

it isnt an argument its an opinion

@Logrian unkute

unmute

dont be a prat

@chad46 halp

unmite

unmute

The idea behind the argument is that gas pressure can’t exist next to a vacuum

How is an opinion used in opposition to another than an argument?

its just put there

rather then claiming something is impossible

“I think this will/won’t” rather than “this will/won’t” doesn’t change whether or not it isn’t an argument

ok

This was a pretty pointless subconversation, wasnt it? 😅

no

i really dont know what goes on in the sky

But you’re claiming that given x, y will happen

yes, but im not fixed on it

i will not say space doesnt exist because x

And that’s why this sub-conversation was pointless, you’re skirting around the point that you are using the same argument. Flat Earthers saying space can’t exist next to an atmosphere don’t believe space exists, but they still use that argument

It’s a given X, Y kind of thing. It’s an argument, and you’re using it. You’re just removing yourself from the responsibility.

im not using it

But regardless, I huh again, it was still fun

i dont use that argument to support flat earth

i was arguing for it because i think its the case

but it doesnt prove flat earth

(Back for a quick sec)
You’re using it as an argument against globe earth, and you’re still using that as an argument

It extends into a proof by contradiction

its a claim i do not have sufficient proof for

hence just an opinion