Message from @IXI

Discord ID: 658901365690597406


2019-12-24 05:07:13 UTC  

then think about all the others

2019-12-24 05:07:20 UTC  

einstien wasn't funded

2019-12-24 05:07:46 UTC  

im talking about today

2019-12-24 05:08:20 UTC  

even today

2019-12-24 05:09:15 UTC  

nah today majority of studies require large fundings

2019-12-24 05:09:29 UTC  

23% of studies aren't funded

2019-12-24 05:09:43 UTC  

and thats not a small minority

2019-12-24 05:10:26 UTC  

yes that is a minority and those studies without much fundings are using poor methodology

2019-12-24 05:10:38 UTC  

usually analyzing and interpeting data

2019-12-24 05:10:43 UTC  

not conducting anything really

2019-12-24 05:11:12 UTC  

so what are you trying to say

2019-12-24 05:12:09 UTC  

what are you trying to prove, ultimately.

2019-12-24 05:12:45 UTC  

nevermind

2019-12-24 05:12:57 UTC  

i forgot what i tried to point out

2019-12-24 05:13:02 UTC  

exactly

2019-12-24 05:14:54 UTC  

i believe i meant that main stream research should be taken with high skepticism

2019-12-24 05:16:16 UTC  

and it is

2019-12-24 05:16:35 UTC  

thats why the scientific method exists

2019-12-24 05:18:10 UTC  

well you guys were talking about climate science i doubt any scientific method was used there

2019-12-24 05:18:37 UTC  

it was

2019-12-24 05:18:47 UTC  

fine show me

2019-12-24 05:19:03 UTC  

what scientific method they used to prove humans cause global warming

2019-12-24 05:19:15 UTC  

guess what, they cant

2019-12-24 05:20:03 UTC  

in order for them to properly use the scientific method there, they would need to replicate a copy of the earth without humans and see if global warming happens

2019-12-24 05:20:48 UTC  

this is what a scientific method is, and just like many other fields of studies, climate science is very inaccurate simply because its near impossible to use the scientific method

2019-12-24 05:21:39 UTC  

so you mind explaining

2019-12-24 05:21:39 UTC  

NASA is already a discredited witness. any judge would throw out all their evidence in court

2019-12-24 05:22:03 UTC  

how did they discover man-made climate change

2019-12-24 05:22:21 UTC  

what methodology was used to come up with this conclusion

2019-12-24 05:22:40 UTC  

im asking you

2019-12-24 05:22:55 UTC  

2019-12-24 05:23:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/658902475461623809/globe_-_same_cloud_pattern_2002_2007.png

2019-12-24 05:23:20 UTC  

yes. this is an organization we can trust....

2019-12-24 05:23:31 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/658902556818407434/NASA_blue_marble.png

2019-12-24 05:25:11 UTC  

even if i trust nasa, whats the scientific method used

2019-12-24 05:25:18 UTC  

in the post he linked about human causes

2019-12-24 05:25:19 UTC  

In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from countries all over the world under the auspices of the United Nations, concluded there's a more than 95 percent probability that human activities over the past 50 years have warmed our planet.

The industrial activities that our modern civilization depends upon have raised atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from 280 parts per million to 400 parts per million in the last 150 years. The panel also concluded there's a better than 95 percent probability that human-produced greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have caused much of the observed increase in Earth's temperatures over the past 50 years.